biodiversity: be good for environment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents issue
Weight: 0.59
, resource
Weight: 0.58
, concept
Weight: 0.57
, carbon
Weight: 0.56
, topic
Weight: 0.56
Siblings ecology
Weight: 0.34
, desertification
Weight: 0.34
, conservation
Weight: 0.34
, carbon tetrachloride
Weight: 0.33
, coral reef
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for environment 1.00
be bad for environment 0.97
be beneficial to environment 0.87
has quality good 0.80
is good thing 0.78
has quality better 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(conservation, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(conservation, is good thing)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(biodiversity, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(conservation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(conservation, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(biodiversity, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(conservation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(conservation, is good thing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(biodiversity, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(biodiversity, be good for environment)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(biodiversity, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, be bad for environment)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(biodiversity, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(biodiversity, be bad for environment)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(biodiversity, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(biodiversity, be bad for environment)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(biodiversity, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(biodiversity, be bad for environment)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(biodiversity, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, be beneficial to environment)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(biodiversity, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(biodiversity, be beneficial to environment)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(biodiversity, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, has quality good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(biodiversity, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, has quality better)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(biodiversity, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, is good thing)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(biodiversity, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(biodiversity, be beneficial to environment)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(biodiversity, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(biodiversity, is good thing)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(biodiversity, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(biodiversity, be beneficial to environment)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(biodiversity, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(biodiversity, has quality better)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(biodiversity, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(biodiversity, is good thing)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(biodiversity, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(biodiversity, is good thing)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(biodiversity, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(biodiversity, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(biodiversity, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(biodiversity, has quality better)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(biodiversity, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(biodiversity, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(biodiversity, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(biodiversity, has quality better)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(biodiversity, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(biodiversity, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(biodiversity, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(biodiversity, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, be good for environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(biodiversity, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(biodiversity, be good for environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(conservation, is good thing)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(conservation, has quality good)