wildlife: be important to ecosystem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents land
Weight: 0.62
, resource
Weight: 0.58
, subject
Weight: 0.56
, attraction
Weight: 0.55
, topic
Weight: 0.55
Siblings geyser
Weight: 0.43
, national forest
Weight: 0.35
, wetland
Weight: 0.35
, conservation
Weight: 0.34
, animal husbandry
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to ecosystem 1.00
be important to environment 0.81
be important to biodiversity 0.80
be important in wetlands 0.77
have biodiversity 0.76
have level of biodiversity 0.76
be important for region 0.76
be important for communities 0.75
have high biodiversity 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be important for communities)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be important to biodiversity)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(wetland, have high biodiversity)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be important to environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(wildlife, be important to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(conservation, be important to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(conservation, be important to environment)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(wildlife, be important to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(conservation, be important to biodiversity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(conservation, be important to biodiversity)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(wildlife, be important to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(wetland, have high biodiversity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(wetland, have high biodiversity)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(wildlife, be important to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(conservation, be important for communities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(conservation, be important for communities)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(wildlife, be important to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(wildlife, be important to ecosystem)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(wildlife, be important to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important to environment)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(wildlife, be important to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important in wetlands)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(wildlife, be important to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(wildlife, be important to environment)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(wildlife, be important to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(wildlife, be important in wetlands)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(wildlife, be important to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(wildlife, be important to environment)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(wildlife, be important to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(wildlife, be important to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important to ecosystem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(wildlife, be important to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(wildlife, be important to ecosystem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(conservation, be important to environment)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(conservation, be important to biodiversity)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(wetland, have high biodiversity)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(conservation, be important for communities)