conservation: be important for communities

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents program
Weight: 0.62
, topic
Weight: 0.60
, strategy
Weight: 0.59
, concept
Weight: 0.59
, issue
Weight: 0.58
Siblings biodiversity
Weight: 0.34
, ecology
Weight: 0.34
, wildlife
Weight: 0.34
, recycling
Weight: 0.33
, animal husbandry
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important for communities 1.00
be important to communities of organisms 0.89
be for community 0.86
be to community 0.85
be important to people 0.80
affect other areas 0.79
be for businesses 0.78
be important to environment 0.78
be different from areas 0.78
affect areas 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(issue, be for businesses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(conservation, be important for communities)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(conservation, be important for communities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(issue, be for businesses)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be important for communities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(issue, be for businesses)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be important for communities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(recycling, be to community)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be important for communities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(recycling, be for community)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be important for communities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, be important to people)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be important for communities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(ecology, affect other areas)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be important for communities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important to environment)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be important for communities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(recycling, be important to environment)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be important for communities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, be important to communities of organisms)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be important for communities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be different from areas)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be important for communities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(ecology, affect areas)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(issue, be for businesses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(conservation, be important for communities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(conservation, be important for communities)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(conservation, be important for communities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(biodiversity, be important to communities of organisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(biodiversity, be important to communities of organisms)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(conservation, be important for communities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(recycling, be for community) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(recycling, be for community)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(conservation, be important for communities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(recycling, be to community) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(recycling, be to community)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(conservation, be important for communities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(biodiversity, be important to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(biodiversity, be important to people)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(conservation, be important for communities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(ecology, be different from areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(ecology, be different from areas)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(conservation, be important for communities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(ecology, affect areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(ecology, affect areas)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(conservation, be important for communities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(recycling, be important to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(recycling, be important to environment)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(conservation, be important for communities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(wildlife, be important to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(wildlife, be important to environment)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(conservation, be important for communities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(ecology, affect other areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(ecology, affect other areas)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(conservation, be important for communities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(conservation, be important for communities)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(conservation, be important for communities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(conservation, be important to environment)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(conservation, be important for communities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(conservation, be important to environment)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(conservation, be important for communities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(conservation, be important to environment)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(conservation, be important for communities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be important to environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(conservation, be important for communities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(conservation, be important for communities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be important for communities)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(conservation, be important for communities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(conservation, be important for communities)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be important for communities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(issue, be for businesses)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be important for communities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(biodiversity, be important to communities of organisms)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be important for communities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(ecology, affect areas)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be important for communities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(ecology, be different from areas)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be important for communities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(recycling, be important to environment)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be important for communities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(wildlife, be important to environment)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be important for communities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(biodiversity, be important to people)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be important for communities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(ecology, affect other areas)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be important for communities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(recycling, be for community)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be important for communities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(recycling, be to community)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(conservation, be important for communities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(issue, be for businesses)