ecology: affect other areas

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents science
Weight: 0.65
, project
Weight: 0.60
, issue
Weight: 0.60
, subject
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.58
Siblings biology
Weight: 0.36
, computer science
Weight: 0.36
, meteorology
Weight: 0.35
, biodiversity
Weight: 0.34
, agriculture
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect other areas 1.00
affect areas 0.97
affect other areas of science 0.92
be different from other areas 0.91
be different from areas 0.89
affect areas of science 0.89
be different from other areas of biology 0.83
be different from areas of biology 0.80
affect life 0.78
affect population 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(ecology, affect other areas)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(biology, affect life)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(ecology, affect other areas)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(biology, affect life)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(biology, affect life)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(ecology, affect other areas)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(ecology, affect other areas)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(ecology, affect other areas)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(ecology, affect areas)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(ecology, affect other areas)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(ecology, affect areas of science)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(ecology, affect other areas)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(ecology, be different from other areas)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(ecology, affect other areas)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(ecology, affect areas)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(ecology, affect other areas)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(ecology, be different from areas)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(ecology, affect other areas)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(ecology, affect areas)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(ecology, affect other areas)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(ecology, be different from areas of biology)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(ecology, affect other areas)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(ecology, be different from other areas of biology)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(ecology, affect other areas)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(ecology, affect areas of science)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(ecology, affect other areas)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(ecology, affect areas)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(ecology, affect other areas)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(ecology, be different from other areas)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(ecology, affect other areas)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(ecology, be different from areas)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(ecology, affect other areas)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(ecology, affect population)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(ecology, affect other areas)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(ecology, be different from other areas)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(ecology, affect other areas)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(ecology, affect other areas of science)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(ecology, affect other areas)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(ecology, be different from areas)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(ecology, affect other areas)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(ecology, affect areas of science)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(ecology, affect other areas)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(ecology, affect life)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(ecology, affect other areas)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(ecology, affect other areas of science)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(ecology, affect other areas)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(ecology, affect other areas of science)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(ecology, affect other areas)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(ecology, be different from areas of biology)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(ecology, affect other areas)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be different from other areas)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(ecology, affect other areas)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be different from areas)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(ecology, affect other areas)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(ecology, be different from other areas of biology)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(ecology, affect other areas)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(ecology, affect other areas of science)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(ecology, affect other areas)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(ecology, affect areas of science)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(ecology, affect other areas)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(ecology, be different from other areas of biology)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(ecology, affect other areas)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(ecology, affect population)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(ecology, affect other areas)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(ecology, be different from areas of biology)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(ecology, affect other areas)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(ecology, affect life)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(ecology, affect other areas)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be different from other areas of biology)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(ecology, affect other areas)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(ecology, affect population)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(ecology, affect other areas)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(ecology, affect life)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(ecology, affect other areas)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be different from areas of biology)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(ecology, affect other areas)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(ecology, affect life)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(ecology, affect other areas)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(ecology, affect population)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(ecology, affect other areas)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(ecology, affect other areas)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(ecology, affect other areas)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(ecology, affect other areas)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(ecology, affect other areas)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(ecology, affect other areas)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(biology, affect life)