ecology: affect population

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents science
Weight: 0.65
, project
Weight: 0.60
, issue
Weight: 0.60
, subject
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.58
Siblings biology
Weight: 0.36
, computer science
Weight: 0.36
, meteorology
Weight: 0.35
, biodiversity
Weight: 0.34
, agriculture
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect population 1.00
affect areas 0.78
affect other areas 0.77
affect life 0.76
affect culture 0.75
affect areas of science 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(ecology, affect population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(biology, affect life)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(ecology, affect population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(biology, affect life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(biology, affect life)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(ecology, affect population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(ecology, affect population)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(ecology, affect population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(ecology, affect areas)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(ecology, affect population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(ecology, affect other areas)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(ecology, affect population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(ecology, affect life)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(ecology, affect population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(ecology, affect culture)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(ecology, affect population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(ecology, affect areas of science)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(ecology, affect population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(ecology, affect population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(ecology, affect population)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(ecology, affect population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(ecology, affect population)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(ecology, affect population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(biology, affect life)