ecology: affect culture

Property	Similarity
affect culture	1.00
affect life	0.81
affect human life	0.78
affect other areas of science	0.76
affect areas of science	0.76
affect population	0.75
affect areas	0.75
affect other areas	0.75

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.91

Remarkable(ecology, affect culture) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(ecology, affect life)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.08

Typical(ecology, affect culture) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(ecology, affect population)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.08

Typical(ecology, affect culture) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Typical(ecology, affect life)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.08

Typical(ecology, affect culture) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Typical(ecology, affect areas of science)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.91

Remarkable(ecology, affect culture) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(ecology, affect human life)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.91

Remarkable(ecology, affect culture) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(ecology, affect other areas of science)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.08

Typical(ecology, affect culture) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Typical(ecology, affect areas)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.91

Remarkable(ecology, affect culture) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(ecology, affect other areas)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.91

Remarkable(ecology, affect culture) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(ecology, affect areas of science)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.91

Remarkable(ecology, affect culture) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(ecology, affect population)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.91

Remarkable(ecology, affect culture) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Remarkable(ecology, affect areas)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.08

Typical(ecology, affect culture) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Typical(ecology, affect human life)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(ecology, affect culture) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Plausible(ecology, affect population)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(ecology, affect culture) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Plausible(ecology, affect life)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(ecology, affect culture) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Plausible(ecology, affect areas of science)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(ecology, affect culture) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Plausible(ecology, affect areas)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(ecology, affect culture) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Plausible(ecology, affect human life)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.46

Salient(ecology, affect culture) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Salient(ecology, affect life)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.46

Salient(ecology, affect culture) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Salient(ecology, affect population)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.46

Salient(ecology, affect culture) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Salient(ecology, affect human life)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.46

Salient(ecology, affect culture) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Salient(ecology, affect areas)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.46

Salient(ecology, affect culture) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Salient(ecology, affect areas of science)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.08

Typical(ecology, affect culture) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Typical(ecology, affect other areas of science)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.46

Salient(ecology, affect culture) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Salient(ecology, affect other areas)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(ecology, affect culture) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Plausible(ecology, affect other areas of science)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.46

Salient(ecology, affect culture) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Salient(ecology, affect other areas of science)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(ecology, affect culture) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Plausible(ecology, affect other areas)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.08

Typical(ecology, affect culture) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Typical(ecology, affect other areas)

Parents	science Weight: 0.65 , project Weight: 0.60 , issue Weight: 0.60 , subject Weight: 0.58 , thing Weight: 0.58
Siblings	biology Weight: 0.36 , computer science Weight: 0.36 , meteorology Weight: 0.35 , biodiversity Weight: 0.34 , agriculture Weight: 0.34

ecology: affect culture

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings