ecology: affect culture

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents science
Weight: 0.65
, project
Weight: 0.60
, issue
Weight: 0.60
, subject
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.58
Siblings biology
Weight: 0.36
, computer science
Weight: 0.36
, meteorology
Weight: 0.35
, biodiversity
Weight: 0.34
, agriculture
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect culture 1.00
affect life 0.81
affect human life 0.78
affect other areas of science 0.76
affect areas of science 0.76
affect population 0.75
affect areas 0.75
affect other areas 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(ecology, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(biology, affect human life)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(ecology, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(biology, affect life)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(ecology, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(biology, affect life)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(biology, affect life)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(ecology, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(biology, affect human life)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(biology, affect human life)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(ecology, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(ecology, affect culture)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(ecology, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(ecology, affect life)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(ecology, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(ecology, affect population)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(ecology, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(ecology, affect life)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(ecology, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(ecology, affect areas of science)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(ecology, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(ecology, affect human life)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(ecology, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(ecology, affect other areas of science)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(ecology, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(ecology, affect areas)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(ecology, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(ecology, affect other areas)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(ecology, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(ecology, affect areas of science)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(ecology, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(ecology, affect population)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(ecology, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(ecology, affect areas)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(ecology, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(ecology, affect human life)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(ecology, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(ecology, affect population)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(ecology, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(ecology, affect life)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(ecology, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(ecology, affect areas of science)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(ecology, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(ecology, affect areas)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(ecology, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(ecology, affect human life)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(ecology, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(ecology, affect life)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(ecology, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(ecology, affect population)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(ecology, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(ecology, affect human life)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(ecology, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(ecology, affect areas)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(ecology, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(ecology, affect areas of science)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(ecology, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(ecology, affect other areas of science)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(ecology, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(ecology, affect other areas)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(ecology, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(ecology, affect other areas of science)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(ecology, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(ecology, affect other areas of science)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(ecology, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(ecology, affect other areas)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(ecology, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(ecology, affect other areas)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(ecology, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(ecology, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(ecology, affect culture)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(ecology, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(ecology, affect culture)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(ecology, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(biology, affect life)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(ecology, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(biology, affect human life)