arctic fox: be in danger

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wildlife
Weight: 0.74
, polar bear
Weight: 0.74
, predator
Weight: 0.73
, species
Weight: 0.71
Siblings red fox
Weight: 0.71
, fox
Weight: 0.39
, snowy owl
Weight: 0.38
, squirrel
Weight: 0.38
, gray fox
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in danger 1.00
be at risk 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(polar bear, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(arctic fox, be in danger)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(polar bear, be at risk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(arctic fox, be in danger)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(wildlife, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(arctic fox, be in danger)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(wildlife, be at risk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(arctic fox, be in danger)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(arctic fox, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(wildlife, be in danger)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(arctic fox, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(polar bear, be in danger)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(arctic fox, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(wildlife, be at risk)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(arctic fox, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(polar bear, be at risk)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, be in danger)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be in danger)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be at risk)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, be at risk)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(snowy owl, be in danger)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(polar bear, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(arctic fox, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, be in danger)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(wildlife, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(arctic fox, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, be in danger)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(polar bear, be at risk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(arctic fox, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, be in danger)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(wildlife, be at risk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(arctic fox, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, be in danger)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(arctic fox, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(snowy owl, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(snowy owl, be in danger)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(arctic fox, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(arctic fox, be in danger)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(arctic fox, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(arctic fox, be at risk)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(arctic fox, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(arctic fox, be at risk)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(arctic fox, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, be at risk)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(arctic fox, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, be at risk)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(arctic fox, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(arctic fox, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, be in danger)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(arctic fox, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(arctic fox, be in danger)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(wildlife, be in danger)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(wildlife, be at risk)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(polar bear, be at risk)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(polar bear, be in danger)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(snowy owl, be in danger)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(arctic fox, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(wildlife, be in danger)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(arctic fox, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(polar bear, be in danger)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(arctic fox, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(wildlife, be at risk)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(arctic fox, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(polar bear, be at risk)