wildlife: be in danger

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents land
Weight: 0.62
, resource
Weight: 0.58
, subject
Weight: 0.56
, attraction
Weight: 0.55
, topic
Weight: 0.55
Siblings geyser
Weight: 0.43
, national forest
Weight: 0.35
, wetland
Weight: 0.35
, conservation
Weight: 0.34
, animal husbandry
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in danger 1.00
be under threat 0.84
be at risk 0.80
is dangerous 0.77
be at risk in antarctica 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be at risk)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be in danger)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(wetland, is dangerous)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(geyser, is dangerous)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be under threat)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(wildlife, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(wetland, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(wetland, be in danger)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(wildlife, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(wetland, be under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(wetland, be under threat)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(wildlife, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(wetland, be at risk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(wetland, be at risk)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(wildlife, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(wetland, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(wetland, is dangerous)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(wildlife, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(geyser, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(geyser, is dangerous)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(wildlife, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(wildlife, be in danger)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(wildlife, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(wildlife, be under threat)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(wildlife, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(wildlife, be at risk)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(wildlife, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be under threat)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(wildlife, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, is dangerous)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(wildlife, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be at risk in antarctica)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(wildlife, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be at risk)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(wildlife, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(wildlife, be under threat)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(wildlife, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(wildlife, be at risk)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(wildlife, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(wildlife, be at risk)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(wildlife, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(wildlife, be under threat)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(wildlife, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(wildlife, is dangerous)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(wildlife, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(wildlife, be at risk in antarctica)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(wildlife, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(wildlife, is dangerous)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(wildlife, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(wildlife, be at risk in antarctica)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(wildlife, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(wildlife, is dangerous)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(wildlife, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(wildlife, be at risk in antarctica)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(wildlife, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(wildlife, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be in danger)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(wildlife, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(wildlife, be in danger)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(wetland, be at risk)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(wetland, be under threat)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(wetland, be in danger)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(wetland, is dangerous)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(geyser, is dangerous)