wildlife: be at risk in antarctica

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents land
Weight: 0.62
, resource
Weight: 0.58
, subject
Weight: 0.56
, attraction
Weight: 0.55
, topic
Weight: 0.55
Siblings geyser
Weight: 0.43
, national forest
Weight: 0.35
, wetland
Weight: 0.35
, conservation
Weight: 0.34
, animal husbandry
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at risk in antarctica 1.00
be at risk 0.92
be in antarctica 0.82
be endangered in antarctica 0.78
be in danger 0.77
be issue to antarctica 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be at risk in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be at risk)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be at risk in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be in danger)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(wildlife, be at risk in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(wetland, be at risk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(wetland, be at risk)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(wildlife, be at risk in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(wetland, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(wetland, be in danger)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(wildlife, be at risk in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(wildlife, be at risk in antarctica)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(wildlife, be at risk in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(wildlife, be at risk)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(wildlife, be at risk in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(wildlife, be at risk)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(wildlife, be at risk in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(wildlife, be at risk)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(wildlife, be at risk in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(wildlife, be in antarctica)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(wildlife, be at risk in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(wildlife, be in antarctica)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(wildlife, be at risk in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(wildlife, be in danger)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(wildlife, be at risk in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(wildlife, be in antarctica)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(wildlife, be at risk in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(wildlife, be endangered in antarctica)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(wildlife, be at risk in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(wildlife, be in danger)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(wildlife, be at risk in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(wildlife, be issue to antarctica)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(wildlife, be at risk in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(wildlife, be in danger)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(wildlife, be at risk in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(wildlife, be endangered in antarctica)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(wildlife, be at risk in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(wildlife, be issue to antarctica)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(wildlife, be at risk in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(wildlife, be endangered in antarctica)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(wildlife, be at risk in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(wildlife, be issue to antarctica)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(wildlife, be at risk in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be in antarctica)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(wildlife, be at risk in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be issue to antarctica)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(wildlife, be at risk in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be endangered in antarctica)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(wildlife, be at risk in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be at risk)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(wildlife, be at risk in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be in danger)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(wildlife, be at risk in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(wildlife, be at risk in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be at risk in antarctica)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(wildlife, be at risk in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(wildlife, be at risk in antarctica)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be at risk in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(wetland, be at risk)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be at risk in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(wetland, be in danger)