wildlife: be issue to antarctica

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents land
Weight: 0.62
, resource
Weight: 0.58
, subject
Weight: 0.56
, attraction
Weight: 0.55
, topic
Weight: 0.55
Siblings geyser
Weight: 0.43
, national forest
Weight: 0.35
, wetland
Weight: 0.35
, conservation
Weight: 0.34
, animal husbandry
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be issue to antarctica 1.00
be in antarctica 0.81
be at risk in antarctica 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(wildlife, be issue to antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(wildlife, be issue to antarctica)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(wildlife, be issue to antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(wildlife, be in antarctica)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(wildlife, be issue to antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(wildlife, be at risk in antarctica)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(wildlife, be issue to antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(wildlife, be in antarctica)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(wildlife, be issue to antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(wildlife, be in antarctica)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(wildlife, be issue to antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be in antarctica)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(wildlife, be issue to antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(wildlife, be at risk in antarctica)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(wildlife, be issue to antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(wildlife, be at risk in antarctica)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(wildlife, be issue to antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be at risk in antarctica)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(wildlife, be issue to antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(wildlife, be issue to antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be issue to antarctica)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(wildlife, be issue to antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(wildlife, be issue to antarctica)