wetland: be in danger

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents ecosystem
Weight: 0.73
, habitat
Weight: 0.71
, land
Weight: 0.65
, activity
Weight: 0.54
, source
Weight: 0.54
Siblings marsh
Weight: 0.71
, estuary
Weight: 0.58
, grassland
Weight: 0.38
, freshwater
Weight: 0.36
, pond
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in danger 1.00
be under threat 0.84
be at risk 0.80
is dangerous 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(ecosystem, be at risk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(wetland, be in danger)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(ecosystem, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(wetland, be in danger)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(ecosystem, be under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(wetland, be in danger)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(wetland, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(ecosystem, be in danger)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(wetland, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(ecosystem, be under threat)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(wetland, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(ecosystem, be at risk)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(ecosystem, be in danger)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(ecosystem, be at risk)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(ecosystem, be under threat)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(grassland, be in danger)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(pond, is dangerous)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(estuary, be in danger)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(marsh, is dangerous)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(grassland, be under threat)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(ecosystem, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(wetland, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(wetland, be in danger)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(ecosystem, be at risk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(wetland, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(wetland, be in danger)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(ecosystem, be under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(wetland, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(wetland, be in danger)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(wetland, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(estuary, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(estuary, be in danger)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(wetland, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(grassland, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(grassland, be in danger)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(wetland, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(grassland, be under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(grassland, be under threat)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(wetland, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(marsh, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(marsh, is dangerous)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(wetland, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(pond, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(pond, is dangerous)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(wetland, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(wetland, be in danger)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(wetland, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(wetland, be under threat)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(wetland, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(wetland, be at risk)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(wetland, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(wetland, be at risk)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(wetland, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(wetland, be at risk)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(wetland, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(wetland, be under threat)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(wetland, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(wetland, be under threat)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(wetland, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(wetland, is dangerous)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(wetland, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(wetland, is dangerous)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(wetland, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be at risk)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(wetland, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(wetland, is dangerous)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(wetland, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(wetland, is dangerous)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(wetland, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be under threat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(wetland, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(wetland, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be in danger)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(wetland, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(wetland, be in danger)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(ecosystem, be in danger)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(ecosystem, be under threat)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(ecosystem, be at risk)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(grassland, be in danger)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(estuary, be in danger)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(grassland, be under threat)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(pond, is dangerous)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(marsh, is dangerous)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(wetland, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(ecosystem, be in danger)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(wetland, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(ecosystem, be under threat)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(wetland, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(ecosystem, be at risk)