estuary: be in danger

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents ecosystem
Weight: 0.66
, area
Weight: 0.63
, place
Weight: 0.60
, wetland
Weight: 0.58
, shallow water
Weight: 0.54
Siblings chesapeake bay
Weight: 0.72
, bay
Weight: 0.66
, shoreline
Weight: 0.36
, marsh
Weight: 0.36
, coral reef
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in danger 1.00
be at risk 0.80
be at risk of destruction 0.77
be at particularly risk of destruction 0.76
be at particularly risk 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(wetland, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(estuary, be in danger)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(ecosystem, be at risk)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(estuary, be in danger)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(ecosystem, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(estuary, be in danger)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(wetland, be at risk)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(estuary, be in danger)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(estuary, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(ecosystem, be in danger)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(estuary, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(wetland, be in danger)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(estuary, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(wetland, be at risk)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(estuary, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(ecosystem, be at risk)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(estuary, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be in danger)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(estuary, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be at risk)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(estuary, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(ecosystem, be in danger)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(estuary, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(ecosystem, be at risk)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(estuary, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(coral reef, be in danger)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(estuary, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(coral reef, be at risk)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(wetland, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(estuary, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(estuary, be in danger)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(ecosystem, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(estuary, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(estuary, be in danger)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(ecosystem, be at risk)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(estuary, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(estuary, be in danger)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(wetland, be at risk)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(estuary, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(estuary, be in danger)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(estuary, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(coral reef, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(coral reef, be in danger)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(estuary, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(coral reef, be at risk)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(coral reef, be at risk)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(estuary, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(estuary, be in danger)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(estuary, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(estuary, be at particularly risk of destruction)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(estuary, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(estuary, be at particularly risk of destruction)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(estuary, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(estuary, be at particularly risk of destruction)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(estuary, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(estuary, be at particularly risk of destruction)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(estuary, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(estuary, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(estuary, be in danger)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(estuary, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(estuary, be in danger)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(estuary, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(ecosystem, be in danger)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(estuary, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(ecosystem, be at risk)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(estuary, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(wetland, be at risk)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(estuary, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(wetland, be in danger)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(estuary, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(coral reef, be at risk)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(estuary, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(coral reef, be in danger)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(estuary, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(ecosystem, be in danger)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(estuary, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(wetland, be in danger)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(estuary, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(ecosystem, be at risk)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(estuary, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(wetland, be at risk)