grassland: be under threat

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents habitat
Weight: 0.73
, ecosystem
Weight: 0.57
, area
Weight: 0.52
, land
Weight: 0.50
, altitude
Weight: 0.49
Siblings wetland
Weight: 0.38
, marsh
Weight: 0.36
, grass
Weight: 0.35
, moss
Weight: 0.34
, pond
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be under threat 1.00
be in danger 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(ecosystem, be under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(grassland, be under threat)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(ecosystem, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(grassland, be under threat)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(grassland, be under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(ecosystem, be under threat)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(grassland, be under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(ecosystem, be in danger)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(grassland, be under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(ecosystem, be under threat)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(grassland, be under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(ecosystem, be in danger)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(grassland, be under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be in danger)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(grassland, be under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be under threat)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(ecosystem, be under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(grassland, be under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(grassland, be under threat)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(ecosystem, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(grassland, be under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(grassland, be under threat)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(grassland, be under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(wetland, be under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(wetland, be under threat)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(grassland, be under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(wetland, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(wetland, be in danger)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(grassland, be under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(grassland, be under threat)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(grassland, be under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(grassland, be in danger)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(grassland, be under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(grassland, be in danger)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(grassland, be under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(grassland, be in danger)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(grassland, be under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(grassland, be in danger)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(grassland, be under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(grassland, be under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(grassland, be under threat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(grassland, be under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(grassland, be under threat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(grassland, be under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(ecosystem, be under threat)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(grassland, be under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(ecosystem, be in danger)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(grassland, be under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(wetland, be under threat)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(grassland, be under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(wetland, be in danger)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(grassland, be under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(ecosystem, be under threat)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(grassland, be under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(ecosystem, be in danger)