wildlife: be under threat

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents land
Weight: 0.62
, resource
Weight: 0.58
, subject
Weight: 0.56
, attraction
Weight: 0.55
, topic
Weight: 0.55
Siblings geyser
Weight: 0.43
, national forest
Weight: 0.35
, wetland
Weight: 0.35
, conservation
Weight: 0.34
, animal husbandry
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be under threat 1.00
be in danger 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be in danger)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be under threat)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(wildlife, be under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(wetland, be under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(wetland, be under threat)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(wildlife, be under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(wetland, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(wetland, be in danger)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(wildlife, be under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(wildlife, be under threat)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(wildlife, be under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be in danger)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(wildlife, be under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(wildlife, be in danger)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(wildlife, be under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(wildlife, be in danger)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(wildlife, be under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(wildlife, be in danger)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(wildlife, be under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(wildlife, be under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be under threat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(wildlife, be under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(wildlife, be under threat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(wetland, be under threat)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be under threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(wetland, be in danger)