area: be part of town

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents zone
Weight: 0.71
, national park
Weight: 0.70
, route
Weight: 0.63
, landmark
Weight: 0.61
Siblings south carolina
Weight: 0.71
, south dakota
Weight: 0.70
, north carolina
Weight: 0.69
, north dakota
Weight: 0.69
, town
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
be part of town 1.00
be at city 0.82
be used to person to visit from another town 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(landmark, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(area, be part of town)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(area, be part of town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(landmark, be at city)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(area, be part of town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(landmark, be at city)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(area, be part of town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(town, be at city)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(area, be part of town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(town, be used to person to visit from another town)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(landmark, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(area, be part of town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(area, be part of town)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(area, be part of town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(town, be used to person to visit from another town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(town, be used to person to visit from another town)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(area, be part of town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(town, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(town, be at city)

Salient implies Plausible

0.12
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(area, be part of town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(area, be part of town)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(area, be part of town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(area, be part of town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(area, be part of town)

Typical implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(area, be part of town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(area, be part of town)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(area, be part of town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(landmark, be at city)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(area, be part of town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(town, be at city)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(area, be part of town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(town, be used to person to visit from another town)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(area, be part of town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(landmark, be at city)