arkansas: be in tornado

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents state
Weight: 0.60
, place
Weight: 0.57
, school
Weight: 0.55
, alabama
Weight: 0.55
Siblings idaho
Weight: 0.35
, tennessee
Weight: 0.35
, oregon
Weight: 0.34
, nebraska
Weight: 0.34
, georgia
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in tornado 1.00
have tornadoes 0.92
have many tornadoes 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(alabama, have tornadoes)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(arkansas, be in tornado)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(arkansas, be in tornado)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(alabama, have tornadoes)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.53
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(arkansas, be in tornado)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(alabama, have tornadoes)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(arkansas, be in tornado)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(oregon, have tornadoes)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(arkansas, be in tornado)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(idaho, have tornadoes)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(alabama, have tornadoes)
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(arkansas, be in tornado)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(arkansas, be in tornado)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(arkansas, be in tornado)
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(oregon, have tornadoes)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(oregon, have tornadoes)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(arkansas, be in tornado)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(idaho, have tornadoes)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(idaho, have tornadoes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(arkansas, be in tornado)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(arkansas, be in tornado)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(arkansas, be in tornado)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(arkansas, have tornadoes)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(arkansas, be in tornado)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(arkansas, have tornadoes)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(arkansas, be in tornado)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(arkansas, have tornadoes)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(arkansas, be in tornado)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(arkansas, have many tornadoes)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(arkansas, be in tornado)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(arkansas, have many tornadoes)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(arkansas, be in tornado)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(arkansas, have many tornadoes)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(arkansas, be in tornado)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(arkansas, have tornadoes)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(arkansas, be in tornado)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(arkansas, have many tornadoes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(arkansas, be in tornado)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(arkansas, be in tornado)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(arkansas, be in tornado)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(arkansas, be in tornado)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(arkansas, be in tornado)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(arkansas, be in tornado)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(alabama, have tornadoes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(arkansas, be in tornado)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(oregon, have tornadoes)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(arkansas, be in tornado)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(idaho, have tornadoes)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(arkansas, be in tornado)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(alabama, have tornadoes)