arkansas: is dry

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents state
Weight: 0.60
, place
Weight: 0.57
, school
Weight: 0.55
, alabama
Weight: 0.55
Siblings idaho
Weight: 0.35
, tennessee
Weight: 0.35
, oregon
Weight: 0.34
, nebraska
Weight: 0.34
, georgia
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is dry 1.00
is dry state 0.95
have dry counties 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(arkansas, is dry)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(tennessee, is dry state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(arkansas, is dry)
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(tennessee, is dry state)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(tennessee, is dry state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(arkansas, is dry)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(arkansas, is dry)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(arkansas, is dry)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(arkansas, is dry state)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(arkansas, is dry)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(arkansas, is dry state)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(arkansas, is dry)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(arkansas, is dry state)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(arkansas, is dry)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(arkansas, have dry counties)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(arkansas, is dry)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(arkansas, have dry counties)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(arkansas, is dry)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(arkansas, have dry counties)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(arkansas, is dry)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(arkansas, is dry state)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(arkansas, is dry)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(arkansas, have dry counties)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(arkansas, is dry)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(arkansas, is dry)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(arkansas, is dry)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(arkansas, is dry)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(arkansas, is dry)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(arkansas, is dry)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(tennessee, is dry state)