arsenal: is best

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents club
Weight: 0.60
, team
Weight: 0.59
, place
Weight: 0.55
, squad
Weight: 0.52
, building
Weight: 0.51
Siblings armory
Weight: 0.32
, empire state building
Weight: 0.31
, cupboard
Weight: 0.30
, staff
Weight: 0.30
, golf club
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
is best 1.00
be best gaolkeeper 0.99
is best team 0.89
was best players 0.83
be great 0.77
has quality good 0.76
is good team 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(building, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(arsenal, is best)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(club, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(arsenal, is best)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(arsenal, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(club, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(arsenal, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(building, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(arsenal, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(building, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(arsenal, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(club, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(arsenal, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(cupboard, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(arsenal, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(golf club, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(building, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(arsenal, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(arsenal, is best)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(club, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(arsenal, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(arsenal, is best)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(arsenal, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(golf club, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(golf club, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(arsenal, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(cupboard, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(cupboard, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(arsenal, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(arsenal, is best)

Similarity expansion

0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(arsenal, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(arsenal, be best gaolkeeper)
0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(arsenal, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(arsenal, be best gaolkeeper)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(arsenal, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(arsenal, be best gaolkeeper)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(arsenal, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(arsenal, be best gaolkeeper)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(arsenal, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(arsenal, is best team)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(arsenal, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(arsenal, is best team)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(arsenal, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(arsenal, was best players)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(arsenal, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(arsenal, is best team)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(arsenal, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(arsenal, is best team)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(arsenal, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(arsenal, was best players)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(arsenal, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(arsenal, be great)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(arsenal, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(arsenal, was best players)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(arsenal, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(arsenal, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(arsenal, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(arsenal, be great)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(arsenal, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(arsenal, is good team)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(arsenal, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(arsenal, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(arsenal, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(arsenal, be great)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(arsenal, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(arsenal, was best players)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(arsenal, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(arsenal, is good team)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(arsenal, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(arsenal, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(arsenal, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(arsenal, is good team)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(arsenal, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(arsenal, be great)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(arsenal, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(arsenal, is good team)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(arsenal, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(arsenal, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(arsenal, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(arsenal, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(arsenal, is best)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(arsenal, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(arsenal, is best)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(arsenal, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(club, has quality good)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(arsenal, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(building, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(arsenal, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(golf club, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(arsenal, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(cupboard, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(arsenal, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(club, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(arsenal, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(building, has quality good)