arthropod: is most successful

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents invertebrate
Weight: 0.67
, organism
Weight: 0.58
, animal
Weight: 0.55
, parasite
Weight: 0.49
Siblings centipede
Weight: 0.68
, arachnid
Weight: 0.57
, insect
Weight: 0.37
, dung beetle
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is most successful 1.00
is successful 0.93
be considered very successful 0.91
most successful animals on earth 0.84
be said successful 0.84
be successful on land 0.82
is most diverse 0.80
be successful group of animals 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(invertebrate, is successful)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(arthropod, is most successful)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(arthropod, is most successful)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(invertebrate, is successful)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(arthropod, is most successful)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(invertebrate, is successful)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(arthropod, is most successful)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(insect, is successful)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(invertebrate, is successful)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(arthropod, is most successful)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(arthropod, is most successful)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(arthropod, is most successful)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(insect, is successful)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(insect, is successful)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(arthropod, is most successful)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(arthropod, is most successful)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(arthropod, is most successful)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(arthropod, is successful)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(arthropod, is most successful)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(arthropod, most successful animals on earth)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(arthropod, is most successful)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(arthropod, is successful)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(arthropod, is most successful)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(arthropod, be successful on land)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(arthropod, is most successful)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(arthropod, is most diverse)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(arthropod, is most successful)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(arthropod, is successful)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(arthropod, is most successful)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(arthropod, be successful group of animals)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(arthropod, is most successful)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(arthropod, is most diverse)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(arthropod, is most successful)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(arthropod, is most diverse)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(arthropod, is most successful)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(arthropod, most successful animals on earth)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(arthropod, is most successful)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(arthropod, be successful on land)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(arthropod, is most successful)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(arthropod, most successful animals on earth)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(arthropod, is most successful)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(arthropod, be successful on land)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(arthropod, is most successful)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(arthropod, be successful group of animals)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(arthropod, is most successful)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(arthropod, is most diverse)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(arthropod, is most successful)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(arthropod, be successful group of animals)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(arthropod, is most successful)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(arthropod, is successful)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(arthropod, is most successful)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(arthropod, most successful animals on earth)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(arthropod, is most successful)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(arthropod, be successful on land)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(arthropod, is most successful)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(arthropod, be successful group of animals)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(arthropod, is most successful)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(arthropod, is most successful)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(arthropod, is most successful)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(arthropod, is most successful)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(arthropod, is most successful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(arthropod, is most successful)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(invertebrate, is successful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(arthropod, is most successful)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(insect, is successful)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(arthropod, is most successful)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(invertebrate, is successful)