article in magazine: be used to review restaurant

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to review restaurant 1.00
be used to review book 0.87
be used to review film 0.84
be used to review debate 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(article in magazine, be used to review restaurant)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(article in magazine, be used to review restaurant)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(article in magazine, be used to review restaurant)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(article in magazine, be used to review film)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(article in magazine, be used to review restaurant)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(article in magazine, be used to review film)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(article in magazine, be used to review restaurant)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(article in magazine, be used to review book)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(article in magazine, be used to review restaurant)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(article in magazine, be used to review debate)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(article in magazine, be used to review restaurant)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(article in magazine, be used to review book)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(article in magazine, be used to review restaurant)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(article in magazine, be used to review film)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(article in magazine, be used to review restaurant)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(article in magazine, be used to review book)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(article in magazine, be used to review restaurant)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(article in magazine, be used to review debate)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(article in magazine, be used to review restaurant)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(article in magazine, be used to review book)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(article in magazine, be used to review restaurant)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(article in magazine, be used to review debate)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(article in magazine, be used to review restaurant)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(article in magazine, be used to review debate)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(article in magazine, be used to review restaurant)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(article in magazine, be used to review film)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(article in magazine, be used to review restaurant)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(article in magazine, be used to review restaurant)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(article in magazine, be used to review restaurant)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(article in magazine, be used to review restaurant)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(article in magazine, be used to review restaurant)