asbestos: was health hazard

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents substance
Weight: 0.68
, chemical
Weight: 0.68
, hazard
Weight: 0.66
, mineral
Weight: 0.63
, item
Weight: 0.60
Siblings benzene
Weight: 0.36
, arsenic
Weight: 0.35
, manganese
Weight: 0.35
, sulfuric acid
Weight: 0.35
, sulfur dioxide
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
was health hazard 1.00
is health hazard 0.99
be considered health hazard 0.98
is hazard 0.95
be dangerous to health 0.86
be dangerous to human health 0.82
be environmental problem 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(asbestos, was health hazard)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(asbestos, was health hazard)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(asbestos, was health hazard)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(asbestos, is hazard)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(asbestos, was health hazard)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(asbestos, is hazard)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(asbestos, was health hazard)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(asbestos, be considered health hazard)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(asbestos, was health hazard)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(asbestos, is health hazard)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(asbestos, was health hazard)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(asbestos, is hazard)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(asbestos, was health hazard)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(asbestos, is health hazard)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(asbestos, was health hazard)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(asbestos, be dangerous to human health)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(asbestos, was health hazard)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(asbestos, be dangerous to health)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(asbestos, was health hazard)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(asbestos, be considered health hazard)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(asbestos, was health hazard)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(asbestos, be considered health hazard)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(asbestos, was health hazard)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(asbestos, is health hazard)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(asbestos, was health hazard)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(asbestos, is health hazard)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(asbestos, was health hazard)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(asbestos, be considered health hazard)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(asbestos, was health hazard)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(asbestos, be dangerous to human health)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(asbestos, was health hazard)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(asbestos, be dangerous to health)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(asbestos, was health hazard)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(asbestos, be dangerous to human health)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(asbestos, was health hazard)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(asbestos, is hazard)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(asbestos, was health hazard)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(asbestos, be dangerous to health)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(asbestos, was health hazard)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(asbestos, be environmental problem)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(asbestos, was health hazard)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(asbestos, be environmental problem)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(asbestos, was health hazard)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(asbestos, be dangerous to health)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(asbestos, was health hazard)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(asbestos, be dangerous to human health)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(asbestos, was health hazard)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(asbestos, be environmental problem)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(asbestos, was health hazard)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(asbestos, be environmental problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(asbestos, was health hazard)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(asbestos, was health hazard)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(asbestos, was health hazard)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(asbestos, was health hazard)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(asbestos, was health hazard)