asbestosis: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents illness
Weight: 0.69
, disease
Weight: 0.64
, condition
Weight: 0.64
, lung cancer
Weight: 0.48
, cancer
Weight: 0.47
Siblings emphysema
Weight: 0.37
, pneumonia
Weight: 0.36
, silicosis
Weight: 0.36
, bronchitis
Weight: 0.35
, lyme disease
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality worse 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(lung cancer, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(asbestosis, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(cancer, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(asbestosis, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(asbestosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(cancer, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(asbestosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(lung cancer, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(asbestosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(cancer, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(asbestosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(lung cancer, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(asbestosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(silicosis, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(asbestosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(bronchitis, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(asbestosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(pneumonia, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(asbestosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(lyme disease, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(asbestosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(emphysema, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(asbestosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(bronchitis, has quality worse)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(lung cancer, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(asbestosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(asbestosis, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(cancer, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(asbestosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(asbestosis, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(asbestosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(silicosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(silicosis, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(asbestosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(emphysema, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(emphysema, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(asbestosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(lyme disease, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(lyme disease, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(asbestosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(bronchitis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(bronchitis, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(asbestosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(pneumonia, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(pneumonia, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(asbestosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(bronchitis, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(bronchitis, has quality worse)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(asbestosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(asbestosis, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(asbestosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(asbestosis, has quality worse)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(asbestosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(asbestosis, has quality worse)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(asbestosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(asbestosis, has quality worse)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(asbestosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(asbestosis, has quality worse)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(asbestosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(asbestosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(asbestosis, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(asbestosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(asbestosis, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(asbestosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(lung cancer, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(asbestosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(cancer, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(asbestosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(silicosis, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(asbestosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(lyme disease, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(asbestosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(bronchitis, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(asbestosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(pneumonia, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(asbestosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(emphysema, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(asbestosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(bronchitis, has quality worse)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(asbestosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(lung cancer, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(asbestosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(cancer, has quality bad)