silicosis: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents disease
Weight: 0.64
, illness
Weight: 0.53
, case
Weight: 0.51
, condition
Weight: 0.48
, problem
Weight: 0.47
Siblings asbestosis
Weight: 0.36
, lyme disease
Weight: 0.35
, tuberculosis
Weight: 0.34
, bovine spongiform encephalopathy
Weight: 0.34
, sarcoidosis
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(silicosis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(asbestosis, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(silicosis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(tuberculosis, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(silicosis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(sarcoidosis, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(silicosis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(lyme disease, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(silicosis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(asbestosis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(asbestosis, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(silicosis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(lyme disease, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(lyme disease, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(silicosis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(sarcoidosis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(sarcoidosis, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(silicosis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(tuberculosis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(tuberculosis, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(silicosis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(silicosis, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(silicosis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(silicosis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(silicosis, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(silicosis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(silicosis, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(silicosis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(asbestosis, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(silicosis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sarcoidosis, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(silicosis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(lyme disease, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(silicosis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(tuberculosis, has quality bad)