sarcoidosis: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents disease
Weight: 0.65
, condition
Weight: 0.63
, infection
Weight: 0.60
, inflammation
Weight: 0.53
, cause
Weight: 0.42
Siblings lyme disease
Weight: 0.36
, pelvic inflammatory disease
Weight: 0.36
, asbestosis
Weight: 0.35
, emphysema
Weight: 0.35
, pneumonia
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality worse 0.87
is bad people 0.80
be bad for body 0.76
is good thing 0.75
be in body bad 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(infection, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sarcoidosis, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(inflammation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sarcoidosis, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(inflammation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sarcoidosis, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(inflammation, be bad for body)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sarcoidosis, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(inflammation, be in body bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sarcoidosis, has quality bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(inflammation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sarcoidosis, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(sarcoidosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(inflammation, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(sarcoidosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(inflammation, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(sarcoidosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(infection, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(sarcoidosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(inflammation, is good thing)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(sarcoidosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(inflammation, be in body bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(sarcoidosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(inflammation, be bad for body)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(sarcoidosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(inflammation, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(sarcoidosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(infection, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(sarcoidosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(inflammation, is good thing)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(sarcoidosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(inflammation, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(sarcoidosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(inflammation, be bad for body)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(sarcoidosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(inflammation, be in body bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(sarcoidosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(asbestosis, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(sarcoidosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(pneumonia, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(sarcoidosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(asbestosis, has quality worse)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(sarcoidosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(lyme disease, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(sarcoidosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(emphysema, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(infection, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(sarcoidosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(sarcoidosis, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(inflammation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(sarcoidosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(sarcoidosis, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(inflammation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(sarcoidosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(sarcoidosis, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(inflammation, be bad for body)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(sarcoidosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(sarcoidosis, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(inflammation, be in body bad)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(sarcoidosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(sarcoidosis, has quality bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(inflammation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(sarcoidosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(sarcoidosis, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(sarcoidosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(asbestosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(asbestosis, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(sarcoidosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(emphysema, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(emphysema, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(sarcoidosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(lyme disease, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(lyme disease, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(sarcoidosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(pneumonia, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(pneumonia, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(sarcoidosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(asbestosis, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(asbestosis, has quality worse)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(sarcoidosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(sarcoidosis, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(sarcoidosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(sarcoidosis, has quality good)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(sarcoidosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(sarcoidosis, has quality good)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(sarcoidosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(sarcoidosis, has quality good)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(sarcoidosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(sarcoidosis, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(sarcoidosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sarcoidosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(sarcoidosis, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(sarcoidosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sarcoidosis, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(sarcoidosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(inflammation, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(sarcoidosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(inflammation, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(sarcoidosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(inflammation, be in body bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(sarcoidosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(inflammation, is good thing)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(sarcoidosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(infection, has quality bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(sarcoidosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(inflammation, be bad for body)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(sarcoidosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(asbestosis, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(sarcoidosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(asbestosis, has quality worse)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(sarcoidosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(lyme disease, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(sarcoidosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(pneumonia, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(sarcoidosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(emphysema, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(sarcoidosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(inflammation, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(sarcoidosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(infection, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(sarcoidosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(inflammation, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(sarcoidosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(inflammation, be in body bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(sarcoidosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(inflammation, is good thing)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(sarcoidosis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(inflammation, be bad for body)