assault: is partisan issue

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents felony
Weight: 0.63
, attack
Weight: 0.62
, event
Weight: 0.62
, charge
Weight: 0.62
, issue
Weight: 0.61
Siblings sexual assault
Weight: 0.70
, rape
Weight: 0.36
, robbery
Weight: 0.35
, first degree murder
Weight: 0.35
, manslaughter
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is partisan issue 1.00
is partisan 0.96
is issue 0.79
be issue 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(assault, is partisan issue)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, is partisan issue)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(assault, is partisan issue)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(robbery, is issue)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(assault, is partisan issue)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, is issue)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(assault, is partisan issue)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(sexual assault, is partisan issue)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(sexual assault, is partisan issue)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(assault, is partisan issue)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(sexual assault, is issue)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(sexual assault, is issue)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(assault, is partisan issue)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(robbery, is issue)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(robbery, is issue)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(assault, is partisan issue)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(assault, is partisan issue)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(assault, is partisan issue)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(assault, is partisan)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(assault, is partisan issue)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(assault, is partisan)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(assault, is partisan issue)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(assault, is partisan)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(assault, is partisan issue)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(assault, is issue)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(assault, is partisan issue)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(assault, is issue)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(assault, is partisan issue)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(assault, is partisan)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(assault, is partisan issue)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(assault, is issue)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(assault, is partisan issue)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(assault, is issue)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(assault, is partisan issue)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(assault, is partisan issue)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(assault, is partisan issue)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(assault, is partisan issue)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(assault, is partisan issue)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(assault, is partisan issue)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(robbery, is issue)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(assault, is partisan issue)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(sexual assault, is issue)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(assault, is partisan issue)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(sexual assault, is partisan issue)