assault: is social

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents felony
Weight: 0.63
, attack
Weight: 0.62
, event
Weight: 0.62
, charge
Weight: 0.62
, issue
Weight: 0.61
Siblings sexual assault
Weight: 0.70
, rape
Weight: 0.36
, robbery
Weight: 0.35
, first degree murder
Weight: 0.35
, manslaughter
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is social 1.00
is social problem 0.88
affect social media 0.87
is social justice issue 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(attack, affect social media) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(assault, is social)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(assault, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(attack, affect social media)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(assault, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(attack, affect social media)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(assault, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(robbery, is social)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(assault, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, is social justice issue)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(assault, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(robbery, is social problem)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(attack, affect social media) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(assault, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(assault, is social)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(assault, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(robbery, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(robbery, is social)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(assault, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(robbery, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(robbery, is social problem)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(assault, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(sexual assault, is social justice issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(sexual assault, is social justice issue)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(assault, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(assault, is social)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(assault, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(assault, is social justice issue)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(assault, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(assault, is social justice issue)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(assault, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(assault, is social justice issue)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(assault, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(assault, is social justice issue)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(assault, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(assault, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(assault, is social)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(assault, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(assault, is social)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(assault, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(attack, affect social media)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(assault, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(robbery, is social)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(assault, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(robbery, is social problem)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(assault, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(sexual assault, is social justice issue)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(assault, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(attack, affect social media)