attack: affect social media

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents move
Weight: 0.60
, command
Weight: 0.60
, atrocity
Weight: 0.59
, challenge
Weight: 0.58
Siblings blast
Weight: 0.63
, assault
Weight: 0.62
, counterattack
Weight: 0.62
, shooting
Weight: 0.61
, strike
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect social media 1.00
affect media 0.93
is social 0.87
is social justice issue 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(attack, affect social media) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(assault, is social)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(attack, affect social media) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(assault, is social justice issue)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(attack, affect social media) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(assault, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(assault, is social)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(attack, affect social media) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(assault, is social justice issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(assault, is social justice issue)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(attack, affect social media) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(attack, affect social media)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(attack, affect social media) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(attack, affect media)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(attack, affect social media) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(attack, affect media)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(attack, affect social media) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(attack, affect media)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(attack, affect social media) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(attack, affect media)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(attack, affect social media) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(attack, affect social media) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(attack, affect social media)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(attack, affect social media) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(attack, affect social media)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(attack, affect social media) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(assault, is social)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(attack, affect social media) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(assault, is social justice issue)