assembly: have considered dependent language

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents body
Weight: 0.64
, authority
Weight: 0.62
, operation
Weight: 0.61
Siblings chassis
Weight: 0.50
, truss
Weight: 0.44
, parliament
Weight: 0.34
, congress
Weight: 0.33
, council
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
have considered dependent language 1.00
have considered machine dependent language 0.94
have considered language 0.87
is language 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(assembly, have considered dependent language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(assembly, have considered dependent language)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(assembly, have considered dependent language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(assembly, have considered machine dependent language)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(assembly, have considered dependent language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(assembly, have considered machine dependent language)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(assembly, have considered dependent language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(assembly, have considered language)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(assembly, have considered dependent language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(assembly, have considered machine dependent language)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(assembly, have considered dependent language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(assembly, have considered language)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(assembly, have considered dependent language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(assembly, have considered language)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(assembly, have considered dependent language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(assembly, is language)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(assembly, have considered dependent language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(assembly, is language)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(assembly, have considered dependent language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(assembly, is language)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(assembly, have considered dependent language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(assembly, have considered machine dependent language)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(assembly, have considered dependent language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(assembly, have considered language)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(assembly, have considered dependent language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(assembly, is language)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(assembly, have considered dependent language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(assembly, have considered dependent language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(assembly, have considered dependent language)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(assembly, have considered dependent language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(assembly, have considered dependent language)