assembly: have considered language

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents body
Weight: 0.64
, authority
Weight: 0.62
, operation
Weight: 0.61
Siblings chassis
Weight: 0.50
, truss
Weight: 0.44
, parliament
Weight: 0.34
, congress
Weight: 0.33
, council
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
have considered language 1.00
is language 0.93
have considered dependent language 0.87
have considered machine dependent language 0.82
have known as level languages languages 0.80
have known as low level languages languages 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(assembly, have considered language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(assembly, have considered language)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(assembly, have considered language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(assembly, is language)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(assembly, have considered language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(assembly, is language)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(assembly, have considered language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(assembly, have considered dependent language)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(assembly, have considered language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(assembly, have considered dependent language)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(assembly, have considered language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(assembly, have considered machine dependent language)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(assembly, have considered language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(assembly, have known as level languages languages)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(assembly, have considered language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(assembly, have known as low level languages languages)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(assembly, have considered language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(assembly, is language)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(assembly, have considered language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(assembly, have considered machine dependent language)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(assembly, have considered language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(assembly, have known as level languages languages)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(assembly, have considered language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(assembly, is language)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(assembly, have considered language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(assembly, have considered dependent language)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(assembly, have considered language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(assembly, have considered machine dependent language)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(assembly, have considered language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(assembly, have considered machine dependent language)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(assembly, have considered language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(assembly, have known as level languages languages)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(assembly, have considered language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(assembly, have known as low level languages languages)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(assembly, have considered language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(assembly, have known as low level languages languages)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(assembly, have considered language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(assembly, have considered dependent language)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(assembly, have considered language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(assembly, have known as level languages languages)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(assembly, have considered language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(assembly, have known as low level languages languages)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(assembly, have considered language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(assembly, have considered language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(assembly, have considered language)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(assembly, have considered language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(assembly, have considered language)