asset: be increased with credits

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents loan
Weight: 0.68
, option
Weight: 0.61
, subject
Weight: 0.60
, customer
Weight: 0.59
Siblings experience
Weight: 0.64
, talent
Weight: 0.64
, good will
Weight: 0.57
, domain
Weight: 0.55
, farmland
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
be increased with credits 1.00
CAN can increased with credits 0.93
be increased 0.82
have credits debits 0.80
CAN can increased 0.76
be increased by debits 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(asset, be increased with credits)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(asset, be increased with credits)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(asset, be increased with credits)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(asset, CAN can increased with credits)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(asset, be increased with credits)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(asset, be increased)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(asset, be increased with credits)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(asset, CAN can increased with credits)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(asset, be increased with credits)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(asset, have credits debits)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(asset, be increased with credits)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(asset, have credits debits)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(asset, be increased with credits)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(asset, CAN can increased)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(asset, be increased with credits)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(asset, be increased by debits)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(asset, be increased with credits)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(asset, be increased)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(asset, be increased with credits)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(asset, be increased)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(asset, be increased with credits)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(asset, CAN can increased with credits)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(asset, be increased with credits)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(asset, have credits debits)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(asset, be increased with credits)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(asset, CAN can increased with credits)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(asset, be increased with credits)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(asset, CAN can increased)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(asset, be increased with credits)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(asset, be increased by debits)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(asset, be increased with credits)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(asset, be increased by debits)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(asset, be increased with credits)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(asset, have credits debits)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(asset, be increased with credits)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(asset, CAN can increased)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(asset, be increased with credits)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(asset, CAN can increased)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(asset, be increased with credits)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(asset, be increased)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(asset, be increased with credits)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(asset, be increased by debits)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(asset, be increased with credits)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(asset, be increased with credits)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(asset, be increased with credits)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(asset, be increased with credits)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(asset, be increased with credits)