asset: CAN can increased

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents loan
Weight: 0.68
, option
Weight: 0.61
, subject
Weight: 0.60
, customer
Weight: 0.59
Siblings experience
Weight: 0.64
, talent
Weight: 0.64
, good will
Weight: 0.57
, domain
Weight: 0.55
, farmland
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
CAN can increased 1.00
CAN can increased with credits 0.91
be increased 0.85
be increased with credits 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(asset, CAN can increased)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(asset, CAN can increased)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(asset, CAN can increased)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(asset, be increased)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(asset, CAN can increased)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(asset, be increased)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(asset, CAN can increased)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(asset, CAN can increased with credits)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(asset, CAN can increased)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(asset, be increased)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(asset, CAN can increased)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(asset, CAN can increased with credits)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(asset, CAN can increased)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(asset, CAN can increased with credits)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(asset, CAN can increased)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(asset, CAN can increased with credits)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(asset, CAN can increased)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(asset, be increased with credits)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(asset, CAN can increased)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(asset, be increased with credits)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(asset, CAN can increased)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(asset, be increased with credits)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(asset, CAN can increased)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(asset, be increased)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(asset, CAN can increased)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(asset, be increased with credits)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(asset, CAN can increased)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(asset, CAN can increased)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(asset, CAN can increased)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(asset, CAN can increased)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(asset, CAN can increased)