astronomy: be important to us

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents field
Weight: 0.63
, art
Weight: 0.62
, study
Weight: 0.62
, science
Weight: 0.61
, subject
Weight: 0.60
Siblings computer science
Weight: 0.36
, meteorology
Weight: 0.35
, mathematics
Weight: 0.35
, physics
Weight: 0.35
, quantum physics
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to us 1.00
be important to mayans 0.87
be important today 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, be important to us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(meteorology, be important to us)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(astronomy, be important to us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(meteorology, be important to us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(meteorology, be important to us)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(astronomy, be important to us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(astronomy, be important to us)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(astronomy, be important to us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(astronomy, be important to mayans)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(astronomy, be important to us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(astronomy, be important to mayans)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(astronomy, be important to us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(astronomy, be important to mayans)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(astronomy, be important to us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, be important to mayans)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(astronomy, be important to us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(astronomy, be important today)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(astronomy, be important to us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(astronomy, be important today)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(astronomy, be important to us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(astronomy, be important today)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(astronomy, be important to us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, be important today)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(astronomy, be important to us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(astronomy, be important to us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, be important to us)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(astronomy, be important to us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(astronomy, be important to us)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, be important to us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(meteorology, be important to us)