meteorology: be important to us

Related concepts

Parents	science Weight: 0.70 , field Weight: 0.60 , discipline Weight: 0.57 , subject Weight: 0.57 , thing Weight: 0.56
Siblings	computer science Weight: 0.37 , mathematics Weight: 0.36 , astronomy Weight: 0.35 , biology Weight: 0.35 , physics Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be important to us	1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Remarkable(meteorology, be important to us) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(astronomy, be important to us)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.89

Plausible(meteorology, be important to us) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

Remarkable(astronomy, be important to us) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(astronomy, be important to us)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.89

Plausible(meteorology, be important to us) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Salient(meteorology, be important to us)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.96

Salient(meteorology, be important to us) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(meteorology, be important to us) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Remarkable(meteorology, be important to us)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.89

Plausible(meteorology, be important to us) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(meteorology, be important to us)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Remarkable(meteorology, be important to us) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(astronomy, be important to us)