astronomy: be related to chemistry

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents field
Weight: 0.63
, art
Weight: 0.62
, study
Weight: 0.62
, science
Weight: 0.61
, subject
Weight: 0.60
Siblings computer science
Weight: 0.36
, meteorology
Weight: 0.35
, mathematics
Weight: 0.35
, physics
Weight: 0.35
, quantum physics
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related to chemistry 1.00
be related to physics 0.78
relate to biology 0.78
relate to science 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, be related to chemistry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be related to chemistry)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, be related to chemistry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be related to physics)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, be related to chemistry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(computer science, relate to science)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(astronomy, be related to chemistry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(mathematics, be related to chemistry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(mathematics, be related to chemistry)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(astronomy, be related to chemistry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(mathematics, be related to physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(mathematics, be related to physics)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(astronomy, be related to chemistry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(computer science, relate to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(computer science, relate to science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(astronomy, be related to chemistry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(astronomy, be related to chemistry)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(astronomy, be related to chemistry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(astronomy, relate to biology)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(astronomy, be related to chemistry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(astronomy, relate to biology)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(astronomy, be related to chemistry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(astronomy, relate to biology)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(astronomy, be related to chemistry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, relate to biology)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(astronomy, be related to chemistry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(astronomy, relate to science)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(astronomy, be related to chemistry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(astronomy, be related to physics)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(astronomy, be related to chemistry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(astronomy, relate to science)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(astronomy, be related to chemistry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(astronomy, be related to physics)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(astronomy, be related to chemistry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(astronomy, relate to science)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(astronomy, be related to chemistry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(astronomy, be related to physics)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(astronomy, be related to chemistry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, be related to physics)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(astronomy, be related to chemistry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, relate to science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(astronomy, be related to chemistry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(astronomy, be related to chemistry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, be related to chemistry)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(astronomy, be related to chemistry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(astronomy, be related to chemistry)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, be related to chemistry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(mathematics, be related to chemistry)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, be related to chemistry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(mathematics, be related to physics)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, be related to chemistry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(computer science, relate to science)