computer science: relate to science

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents science
Weight: 0.83
, technology
Weight: 0.75
, computer program
Weight: 0.74
, computer scientist
Weight: 0.73
Siblings mathematics
Weight: 0.72
, programming language
Weight: 0.67
, artificial intelligence
Weight: 0.65
, biology
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
relate to science 1.00
be science 0.88
is science 0.87
be considered science 0.85
be called computer science 0.81
be better than information science 0.80
be related with physics 0.79
compare to physics 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(technology, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(computer science, relate to science)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(computer science, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(technology, relate to science)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(computer science, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(technology, relate to science)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(computer science, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(biology, relate to science)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(computer science, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(biology, be considered science)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(computer science, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(biology, is science)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.02
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(computer science, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, is science)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.02
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(computer science, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be considered science)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(technology, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(computer science, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(computer science, relate to science)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(computer science, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(biology, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(biology, relate to science)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(computer science, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(mathematics, is science)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(mathematics, is science)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(computer science, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(biology, is science)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(biology, is science)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(computer science, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(mathematics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(mathematics, be considered science)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(computer science, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(biology, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(biology, be considered science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(computer science, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(computer science, relate to science)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(computer science, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(computer science, be science)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(computer science, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(computer science, be science)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(computer science, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(computer science, is science)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(computer science, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(computer science, is science)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(computer science, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(computer science, be considered science)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(computer science, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(computer science, be considered science)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(computer science, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(computer science, be called computer science)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(computer science, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(computer science, be called computer science)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(computer science, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(computer science, be better than information science)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(computer science, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(computer science, be related with physics)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(computer science, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(computer science, be science)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(computer science, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(computer science, is science)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(computer science, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(computer science, be related with physics)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(computer science, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(computer science, compare to physics)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(computer science, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(computer science, be considered science)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(computer science, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(computer science, compare to physics)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(computer science, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(computer science, be called computer science)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(computer science, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(computer science, be better than information science)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(computer science, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(computer science, be science)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(computer science, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(computer science, is science)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(computer science, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(computer science, be considered science)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(computer science, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(computer science, be related with physics)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(computer science, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(computer science, be called computer science)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(computer science, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(computer science, be related with physics)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(computer science, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(computer science, compare to physics)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(computer science, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(computer science, compare to physics)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(computer science, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(computer science, be better than information science)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(computer science, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(computer science, be better than information science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(computer science, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(computer science, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(computer science, relate to science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(computer science, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(computer science, relate to science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(computer science, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(technology, relate to science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(computer science, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(biology, relate to science)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(computer science, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(mathematics, is science)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(computer science, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(biology, is science)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(computer science, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(mathematics, be considered science)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(computer science, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(biology, be considered science)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(computer science, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(technology, relate to science)