computer science: compare to physics

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents science
Weight: 0.83
, technology
Weight: 0.75
, computer program
Weight: 0.74
, computer scientist
Weight: 0.73
Siblings mathematics
Weight: 0.72
, programming language
Weight: 0.67
, artificial intelligence
Weight: 0.65
, biology
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
compare to physics 1.00
need physics 0.89
be related with physics 0.89
require physics 0.86
relate to science 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(technology, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(computer science, compare to physics)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(computer science, compare to physics)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(technology, relate to science)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(computer science, compare to physics)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(technology, relate to science)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(computer science, compare to physics)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(biology, relate to science)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(technology, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(computer science, compare to physics)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(computer science, compare to physics)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(computer science, compare to physics)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(biology, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(biology, relate to science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(computer science, compare to physics)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(computer science, compare to physics)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(computer science, compare to physics)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(computer science, need physics)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(computer science, compare to physics)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(computer science, be related with physics)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(computer science, compare to physics)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(computer science, require physics)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(computer science, compare to physics)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(computer science, need physics)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(computer science, compare to physics)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(computer science, be related with physics)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(computer science, compare to physics)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(computer science, require physics)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(computer science, compare to physics)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(computer science, need physics)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(computer science, compare to physics)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(computer science, relate to science)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(computer science, compare to physics)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(computer science, require physics)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(computer science, compare to physics)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(computer science, be related with physics)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(computer science, compare to physics)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(computer science, need physics)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(computer science, compare to physics)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(computer science, relate to science)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(computer science, compare to physics)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(computer science, require physics)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(computer science, compare to physics)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(computer science, be related with physics)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(computer science, compare to physics)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(computer science, relate to science)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(computer science, compare to physics)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(computer science, relate to science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(computer science, compare to physics)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(computer science, compare to physics)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(computer science, compare to physics)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(computer science, compare to physics)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(computer science, compare to physics)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(computer science, compare to physics)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(technology, relate to science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(computer science, compare to physics)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(biology, relate to science)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(computer science, compare to physics)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(technology, relate to science)