technology: relate to science

Property	Similarity
relate to science	1.00
affect science	0.91
be related to science	0.90
be related in science	0.90
relates to science	0.90
be important to science	0.88
be important in science	0.88
be used in science	0.87
be different from science	0.87
be same as science	0.85

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(technology, relate to science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(technology, be related to science)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.46

Typical(technology, relate to science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Typical(technology, be used in science)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(technology, relate to science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(technology, relates to science)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(technology, relate to science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(technology, affect science)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(technology, relate to science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(technology, be important to science)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(technology, relate to science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(technology, be different from science)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(technology, relate to science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(technology, be important in science)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.46

Typical(technology, relate to science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Typical(technology, affect science)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(technology, relate to science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(technology, be used in science)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(technology, relate to science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(technology, be same as science)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.49

Plausible(technology, relate to science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Plausible(technology, be used in science)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.46

Typical(technology, relate to science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Typical(technology, relates to science)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.49

Plausible(technology, relate to science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Plausible(technology, affect science)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.58

Salient(technology, relate to science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Salient(technology, be used in science)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.49

Plausible(technology, relate to science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Plausible(technology, relates to science)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.58

Salient(technology, relate to science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Salient(technology, relates to science)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.46

Typical(technology, relate to science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Typical(technology, be different from science)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.58

Salient(technology, relate to science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Salient(technology, be different from science)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.49

Plausible(technology, relate to science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Plausible(technology, be different from science)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.58

Salient(technology, relate to science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Salient(technology, be related to science)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.49

Plausible(technology, relate to science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Plausible(technology, be related to science)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.58

Salient(technology, relate to science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Salient(technology, affect science)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.46

Typical(technology, relate to science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Typical(technology, be related to science)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.46

Typical(technology, relate to science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Typical(technology, be same as science)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.49

Plausible(technology, relate to science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Plausible(technology, be same as science)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.46

Typical(technology, relate to science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(technology, be important to science)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.46

Typical(technology, relate to science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(technology, be important in science)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.58

Salient(technology, relate to science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Salient(technology, be same as science)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.49

Plausible(technology, relate to science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Plausible(technology, be important to science)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.49

Plausible(technology, relate to science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(technology, be important in science)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.58

Salient(technology, relate to science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Salient(technology, be important to science)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.58

Salient(technology, relate to science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Salient(technology, be important in science)

Parents	sector Weight: 0.66 , breakthrough Weight: 0.66 , solution Weight: 0.64 , resource Weight: 0.64
Siblings	computer science Weight: 0.75 , computer hardware Weight: 0.74 , fiber optics Weight: 0.73 , computer program Weight: 0.71 , internet service provider Weight: 0.69

technology: relate to science

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings