technology: be related to science

Property	Similarity
be related to science	1.00
be related in science	1.00
affect science	0.92
be used in science	0.92
be important in science	0.92
be important to science	0.91
relate to science	0.90
be different from science	0.89
be same as science	0.89
relates to science	0.88

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.54

Typical(technology, be related to science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Typical(technology, be used in science)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.56

Plausible(technology, be related to science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Plausible(technology, be used in science)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(technology, be related to science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(technology, relate to science)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.54

Typical(technology, be related to science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Typical(technology, affect science)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(technology, be related to science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(technology, be important to science)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(technology, be related to science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(technology, be used in science)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(technology, be related to science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(technology, affect science)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(technology, be related to science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(technology, be important in science)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(technology, be related to science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(technology, be different from science)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.65

Salient(technology, be related to science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Salient(technology, be used in science)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(technology, be related to science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(technology, relates to science)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(technology, be related to science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(technology, be same as science)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.65

Salient(technology, be related to science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Salient(technology, relate to science)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.65

Salient(technology, be related to science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Salient(technology, be different from science)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.54

Typical(technology, be related to science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Typical(technology, be different from science)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.56

Plausible(technology, be related to science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Plausible(technology, affect science)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.54

Typical(technology, be related to science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Typical(technology, relate to science)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.56

Plausible(technology, be related to science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Plausible(technology, be different from science)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.56

Plausible(technology, be related to science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Plausible(technology, relate to science)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.65

Salient(technology, be related to science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Salient(technology, affect science)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.54

Typical(technology, be related to science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Typical(technology, relates to science)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.54

Typical(technology, be related to science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Typical(technology, be same as science)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.65

Salient(technology, be related to science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Salient(technology, relates to science)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.56

Plausible(technology, be related to science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Plausible(technology, relates to science)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.54

Typical(technology, be related to science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(technology, be important in science)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.54

Typical(technology, be related to science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(technology, be important to science)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.65

Salient(technology, be related to science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Salient(technology, be same as science)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.56

Plausible(technology, be related to science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Plausible(technology, be same as science)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.65

Salient(technology, be related to science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Salient(technology, be important to science)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.56

Plausible(technology, be related to science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Plausible(technology, be important to science)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.56

Plausible(technology, be related to science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(technology, be important in science)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.65

Salient(technology, be related to science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Salient(technology, be important in science)

Parents	sector Weight: 0.66 , breakthrough Weight: 0.66 , solution Weight: 0.64 , resource Weight: 0.64
Siblings	computer science Weight: 0.75 , computer hardware Weight: 0.74 , fiber optics Weight: 0.73 , computer program Weight: 0.71 , internet service provider Weight: 0.69

technology: be related to science

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings