technology: relates to science

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sector
Weight: 0.66
, breakthrough
Weight: 0.66
, solution
Weight: 0.64
, resource
Weight: 0.64
Siblings computer science
Weight: 0.75
, computer hardware
Weight: 0.74
, fiber optics
Weight: 0.73
, computer program
Weight: 0.71
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
relates to science 1.00
relate to science 0.90
be related in science 0.88
be related to science 0.88
affect science 0.86
be important in science 0.85
be important to science 0.85
works with science 0.84
be used in science 0.83
be same as science 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(technology, relates to science)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(computer science, relate to science)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(technology, relates to science)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(computer science, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(computer science, relate to science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(technology, relates to science)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(technology, relates to science)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(technology, relates to science)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(technology, relate to science)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(technology, relates to science)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(technology, be related to science)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(technology, relates to science)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(technology, affect science)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(technology, relates to science)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(technology, be used in science)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(technology, relates to science)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(technology, be important in science)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(technology, relates to science)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(technology, be important to science)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(technology, relates to science)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(technology, works with science)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(technology, relates to science)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(technology, be used in science)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(technology, relates to science)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(technology, be same as science)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(technology, relates to science)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(technology, relate to science)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(technology, relates to science)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(technology, affect science)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(technology, relates to science)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(technology, be used in science)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(technology, relates to science)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(technology, relate to science)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(technology, relates to science)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(technology, relate to science)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(technology, relates to science)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(technology, be used in science)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(technology, relates to science)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(technology, be related to science)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(technology, relates to science)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(technology, affect science)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(technology, relates to science)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(technology, be related to science)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(technology, relates to science)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(technology, affect science)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(technology, relates to science)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(technology, be related to science)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(technology, relates to science)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(technology, works with science)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(technology, relates to science)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(technology, be same as science)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(technology, relates to science)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(technology, works with science)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(technology, relates to science)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(technology, be same as science)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(technology, relates to science)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(technology, be same as science)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(technology, relates to science)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(technology, works with science)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(technology, relates to science)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(technology, be important in science)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(technology, relates to science)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(technology, be important to science)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(technology, relates to science)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(technology, be important to science)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(technology, relates to science)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(technology, be important to science)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(technology, relates to science)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(technology, be important in science)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(technology, relates to science)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(technology, be important in science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(technology, relates to science)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(technology, relates to science)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(technology, relates to science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(technology, relates to science)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(technology, relates to science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(technology, relates to science)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(computer science, relate to science)