technology: be important in science

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sector
Weight: 0.66
, breakthrough
Weight: 0.66
, solution
Weight: 0.64
, resource
Weight: 0.64
Siblings computer science
Weight: 0.75
, computer hardware
Weight: 0.74
, fiber optics
Weight: 0.73
, computer program
Weight: 0.71
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in science 1.00
be important to science 1.00
be used in science 0.93
be useful in science 0.93
be related in science 0.92
affect science 0.92
be related to science 0.92
be different from science 0.92
be same as science 0.90
relate to science 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(technology, be important in science)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(computer science, relate to science)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(technology, be important in science)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(computer science, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(computer science, relate to science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(technology, be important in science)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(technology, be important in science)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(technology, be important in science)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(technology, be important to science)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(technology, be important in science)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(technology, be important to science)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(technology, be important in science)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(technology, be used in science)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(technology, be important in science)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(technology, be useful in science)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(technology, be important in science)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(technology, be related to science)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(technology, be important in science)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(technology, be different from science)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(technology, be important in science)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(technology, be used in science)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(technology, be important in science)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(technology, affect science)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(technology, be important in science)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(technology, be used in science)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(technology, be important in science)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(technology, be same as science)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(technology, be important in science)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(technology, be different from science)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(technology, be important in science)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(technology, relate to science)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(technology, be important in science)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(technology, be useful in science)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(technology, be important in science)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(technology, be related to science)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(technology, be important in science)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(technology, be used in science)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(technology, be important in science)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(technology, affect science)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(technology, be important in science)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(technology, be useful in science)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(technology, be important in science)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(technology, be same as science)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(technology, be important in science)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(technology, relate to science)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(technology, be important in science)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(technology, be important to science)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(technology, be important in science)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(technology, be useful in science)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(technology, be important in science)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(technology, affect science)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(technology, be important in science)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(technology, be different from science)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(technology, be important in science)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(technology, affect science)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(technology, be important in science)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(technology, be important to science)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(technology, be important in science)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(technology, be different from science)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(technology, be important in science)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(technology, be related to science)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(technology, be important in science)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(technology, be same as science)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(technology, be important in science)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(technology, relate to science)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(technology, be important in science)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(technology, be same as science)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(technology, be important in science)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(technology, relate to science)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(technology, be important in science)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(technology, be related to science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(technology, be important in science)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(technology, be important in science)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(technology, be important in science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(technology, be important in science)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(technology, be important in science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(technology, be important in science)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(computer science, relate to science)