technology: be important in science

Property	Similarity
be important in science	1.00
be important to science	1.00
be used in science	0.93
be useful in science	0.93
be related in science	0.92
affect science	0.92
be related to science	0.92
be different from science	0.92
be same as science	0.90
relate to science	0.88

0.79

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.92

Remarkable(technology, be important in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(technology, be important to science)

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.83

Salient(technology, be important in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Salient(technology, be important to science)

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.92

Remarkable(technology, be important in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(technology, be used in science)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.92

Remarkable(technology, be important in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(technology, be useful in science)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.92

Remarkable(technology, be important in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(technology, be related to science)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.92

Remarkable(technology, be important in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(technology, be different from science)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.83

Salient(technology, be important in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Salient(technology, be used in science)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.92

Remarkable(technology, be important in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(technology, affect science)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.56

Typical(technology, be important in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Typical(technology, be used in science)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.92

Remarkable(technology, be important in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(technology, be same as science)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.83

Salient(technology, be important in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Salient(technology, be different from science)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.92

Remarkable(technology, be important in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(technology, relate to science)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.83

Salient(technology, be important in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Salient(technology, be useful in science)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.83

Salient(technology, be important in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Salient(technology, be related to science)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(technology, be important in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Plausible(technology, be used in science)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.83

Salient(technology, be important in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Salient(technology, affect science)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.56

Typical(technology, be important in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Typical(technology, be useful in science)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.83

Salient(technology, be important in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Salient(technology, be same as science)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.83

Salient(technology, be important in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Salient(technology, relate to science)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(technology, be important in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Plausible(technology, be important to science)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(technology, be important in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Plausible(technology, be useful in science)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.56

Typical(technology, be important in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Typical(technology, affect science)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(technology, be important in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Plausible(technology, be different from science)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(technology, be important in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Plausible(technology, affect science)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.56

Typical(technology, be important in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(technology, be important to science)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.56

Typical(technology, be important in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Typical(technology, be different from science)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(technology, be important in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Plausible(technology, be related to science)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(technology, be important in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Plausible(technology, be same as science)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(technology, be important in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Plausible(technology, relate to science)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.56

Typical(technology, be important in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Typical(technology, be same as science)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.56

Typical(technology, be important in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Typical(technology, relate to science)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.56

Typical(technology, be important in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Typical(technology, be related to science)

Parents	sector Weight: 0.66 , breakthrough Weight: 0.66 , solution Weight: 0.64 , resource Weight: 0.64
Siblings	computer science Weight: 0.75 , computer hardware Weight: 0.74 , fiber optics Weight: 0.73 , computer program Weight: 0.71 , internet service provider Weight: 0.69

technology: be important in science

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings