technology: be different from science

Property	Similarity
be different from science	1.00
be same as science	0.92
be used in science	0.92
be important in science	0.92
be important to science	0.91
be related in science	0.90
be related to science	0.89
affect science	0.88
be useful in science	0.88
relate to science	0.87

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.43

Typical(technology, be different from science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Typical(technology, be used in science)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.82

Remarkable(technology, be different from science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(technology, be same as science)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.82

Remarkable(technology, be different from science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(technology, be used in science)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.82

Remarkable(technology, be different from science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(technology, be important in science)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.82

Remarkable(technology, be different from science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(technology, be related to science)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.82

Remarkable(technology, be different from science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(technology, be important to science)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.82

Remarkable(technology, be different from science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(technology, relate to science)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.82

Remarkable(technology, be different from science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(technology, affect science)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(technology, be different from science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Plausible(technology, be used in science)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.43

Typical(technology, be different from science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Typical(technology, be useful in science)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.82

Remarkable(technology, be different from science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(technology, be useful in science)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.56

Salient(technology, be different from science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Salient(technology, be used in science)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.43

Typical(technology, be different from science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Typical(technology, affect science)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.43

Typical(technology, be different from science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Typical(technology, be same as science)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(technology, be different from science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Plausible(technology, be useful in science)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(technology, be different from science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Plausible(technology, be same as science)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(technology, be different from science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Plausible(technology, affect science)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.56

Salient(technology, be different from science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Salient(technology, relate to science)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.56

Salient(technology, be different from science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Salient(technology, be same as science)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(technology, be different from science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Plausible(technology, relate to science)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.43

Typical(technology, be different from science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Typical(technology, relate to science)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.56

Salient(technology, be different from science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Salient(technology, be related to science)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(technology, be different from science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Plausible(technology, be related to science)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.43

Typical(technology, be different from science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(technology, be important in science)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.43

Typical(technology, be different from science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(technology, be important to science)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.43

Typical(technology, be different from science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Typical(technology, be related to science)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.56

Salient(technology, be different from science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Salient(technology, affect science)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(technology, be different from science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Plausible(technology, be important to science)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.56

Salient(technology, be different from science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Salient(technology, be useful in science)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(technology, be different from science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(technology, be important in science)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.56

Salient(technology, be different from science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Salient(technology, be important to science)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.56

Salient(technology, be different from science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Salient(technology, be important in science)

Parents	sector Weight: 0.66 , breakthrough Weight: 0.66 , solution Weight: 0.64 , resource Weight: 0.64
Siblings	computer science Weight: 0.75 , computer hardware Weight: 0.74 , fiber optics Weight: 0.73 , computer program Weight: 0.71 , internet service provider Weight: 0.69

technology: be different from science

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings