technology: be same as science

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sector
Weight: 0.66
, breakthrough
Weight: 0.66
, solution
Weight: 0.64
, resource
Weight: 0.64
Siblings computer science
Weight: 0.75
, computer hardware
Weight: 0.74
, fiber optics
Weight: 0.73
, computer program
Weight: 0.71
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
be same as science 1.00
be different from science 0.92
be used in science 0.91
be important in science 0.90
be important to science 0.90
be related in science 0.89
be related to science 0.89
be useful in science 0.86
affect science 0.86
relate to science 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(technology, be same as science)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(computer science, relate to science)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(technology, be same as science)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(computer science, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(computer science, relate to science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(technology, be same as science)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(technology, be same as science)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(technology, be same as science)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(technology, be different from science)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(technology, be same as science)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(technology, be used in science)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(technology, be same as science)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(technology, be used in science)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(technology, be same as science)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(technology, be important in science)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(technology, be same as science)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(technology, be related to science)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(technology, be same as science)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(technology, be important to science)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(technology, be same as science)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(technology, relate to science)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(technology, be same as science)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(technology, affect science)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(technology, be same as science)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(technology, be useful in science)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(technology, be same as science)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(technology, be used in science)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(technology, be same as science)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(technology, be different from science)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(technology, be same as science)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(technology, be used in science)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(technology, be same as science)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(technology, be useful in science)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(technology, be same as science)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(technology, be different from science)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(technology, be same as science)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(technology, be different from science)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(technology, be same as science)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(technology, be related to science)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(technology, be same as science)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(technology, relate to science)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(technology, be same as science)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(technology, affect science)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(technology, be same as science)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(technology, be useful in science)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(technology, be same as science)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(technology, affect science)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(technology, be same as science)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(technology, be important to science)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(technology, be same as science)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(technology, be useful in science)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(technology, be same as science)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(technology, be important in science)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(technology, be same as science)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(technology, affect science)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(technology, be same as science)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(technology, relate to science)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(technology, be same as science)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(technology, be related to science)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(technology, be same as science)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(technology, relate to science)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(technology, be same as science)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(technology, be important to science)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(technology, be same as science)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(technology, be important in science)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(technology, be same as science)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(technology, be important in science)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(technology, be same as science)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(technology, be related to science)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(technology, be same as science)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(technology, be important to science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(technology, be same as science)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(technology, be same as science)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(technology, be same as science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(technology, be same as science)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(technology, be same as science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(technology, be same as science)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(computer science, relate to science)