technology: be used in science

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sector
Weight: 0.66
, breakthrough
Weight: 0.66
, solution
Weight: 0.64
, resource
Weight: 0.64
Siblings computer science
Weight: 0.75
, computer hardware
Weight: 0.74
, fiber optics
Weight: 0.73
, computer program
Weight: 0.71
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used in science 1.00
be important in science 0.93
be important to science 0.93
be related in science 0.92
be related to science 0.92
be different from science 0.92
be useful in science 0.91
be same as science 0.91
affect science 0.90
works with science 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(technology, be used in science)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(technology, be used in science)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(technology, be used in science)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(technology, be important in science)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(technology, be used in science)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(technology, be important to science)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(technology, be used in science)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(technology, be related to science)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(technology, be used in science)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(technology, be different from science)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(technology, be used in science)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(technology, be same as science)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(technology, be used in science)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(technology, be useful in science)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(technology, be used in science)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(technology, affect science)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(technology, be used in science)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(technology, works with science)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(technology, be used in science)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(technology, be useful in science)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(technology, be used in science)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(technology, be different from science)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(technology, be used in science)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(technology, be different from science)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(technology, be used in science)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(technology, be useful in science)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(technology, be used in science)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(technology, affect science)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(technology, be used in science)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(technology, be related to science)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(technology, be used in science)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(technology, be same as science)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(technology, be used in science)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(technology, affect science)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(technology, be used in science)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(technology, be useful in science)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(technology, be used in science)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(technology, be different from science)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(technology, be used in science)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(technology, affect science)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(technology, be used in science)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(technology, be same as science)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(technology, be used in science)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(technology, be related to science)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(technology, be used in science)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(technology, be important to science)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(technology, be used in science)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(technology, be same as science)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(technology, be used in science)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(technology, works with science)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(technology, be used in science)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(technology, be important in science)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(technology, be used in science)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(technology, works with science)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(technology, be used in science)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(technology, be important to science)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(technology, be used in science)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(technology, works with science)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(technology, be used in science)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(technology, be important in science)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(technology, be used in science)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(technology, be related to science)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(technology, be used in science)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(technology, be important in science)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(technology, be used in science)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(technology, be important to science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(technology, be used in science)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(technology, be used in science)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(technology, be used in science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(technology, be used in science)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(technology, be used in science)