mathematics: be considered science

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents science
Weight: 0.73
, computer science
Weight: 0.72
, math
Weight: 0.64
, department
Weight: 0.64
, philosophy
Weight: 0.64
Siblings physics
Weight: 0.37
, quantum physics
Weight: 0.37
, biology
Weight: 0.37
, arithmetic
Weight: 0.37
, metaphysics
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered science 1.00
is science 0.93
be considered field of science 0.93
be considered language of science 0.92
be important to science 0.91
be important in science 0.91
be considered queen of science 0.89
is natural science 0.87
be important to engineering science 0.86
be important to science engineering 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(philosophy, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(mathematics, be considered science)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(computer science, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(mathematics, be considered science)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(philosophy, is science)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(mathematics, be considered science)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(math, is science)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(mathematics, be considered science)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(computer science, is science)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(mathematics, be considered science)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(philosophy, be important in science)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(mathematics, be considered science)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(math, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(mathematics, be considered science)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(math, be important in science)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(mathematics, be considered science)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(mathematics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(computer science, be considered science)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(mathematics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(computer science, is science)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(mathematics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(math, is science)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(mathematics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(philosophy, be considered science)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(mathematics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(philosophy, is science)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(mathematics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(math, be important in science)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(mathematics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(math, be important to science)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(mathematics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(philosophy, be important in science)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(philosophy, be important in science)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(philosophy, be considered science)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(philosophy, is science)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(computer science, be considered science)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(math, be important to science)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.02
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(computer science, is science)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.02
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(math, is science)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.02
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(math, be important in science)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.04
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(physics, be considered science)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.04
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(biology, be considered science)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(biology, is science)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.02
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(physics, is science)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(philosophy, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(mathematics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(mathematics, be considered science)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(computer science, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(mathematics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(mathematics, be considered science)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(philosophy, is science)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(mathematics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(mathematics, be considered science)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(math, is science)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(mathematics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(mathematics, be considered science)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(computer science, is science)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(mathematics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(mathematics, be considered science)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(math, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(mathematics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(mathematics, be considered science)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(philosophy, be important in science)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(mathematics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(mathematics, be considered science)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(math, be important in science)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(mathematics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(mathematics, be considered science)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(mathematics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(biology, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(biology, be considered science)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(mathematics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(physics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(physics, be considered science)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(mathematics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(physics, is science)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(physics, is science)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(mathematics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(biology, is science)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(biology, is science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(mathematics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(mathematics, be considered science)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(mathematics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, is science)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(mathematics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be important to science)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(mathematics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(mathematics, is science)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(mathematics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be important in science)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(mathematics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be important to science engineering)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(mathematics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(mathematics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(mathematics, is science)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(mathematics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(mathematics, is science)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(mathematics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(mathematics, be important in science)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(mathematics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(mathematics, be important to science)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(mathematics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(mathematics, be important to science)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(mathematics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(mathematics, be important in science)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(mathematics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(mathematics, be important in science)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(mathematics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(mathematics, be important to science)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(mathematics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(mathematics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(mathematics, be important to science engineering)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(mathematics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(mathematics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(mathematics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(mathematics, be important to science engineering)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(mathematics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(mathematics, be important to science engineering)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(mathematics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(mathematics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be considered science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(mathematics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(mathematics, be considered science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(computer science, be considered science)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(computer science, is science)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(math, is science)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(math, be important in science)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(philosophy, is science)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(philosophy, be considered science)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(math, be important to science)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(philosophy, be important in science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(biology, be considered science)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(biology, is science)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(physics, be considered science)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(physics, is science)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(mathematics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(computer science, be considered science)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(mathematics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(computer science, is science)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(mathematics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(math, is science)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(mathematics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(math, be important in science)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(mathematics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(philosophy, is science)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(mathematics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(philosophy, be considered science)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(mathematics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(math, be important to science)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(mathematics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(philosophy, be important in science)