philosophy: be important in science

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents discipline
Weight: 0.67
, theme
Weight: 0.66
, approach
Weight: 0.66
, program
Weight: 0.65
Siblings buddhism
Weight: 0.66
, libertarianism
Weight: 0.65
, experience
Weight: 0.64
, materialism
Weight: 0.64
, mathematics
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in science 1.00
is science 0.95
be called science 0.93
be related to science 0.92
be different from science 0.92
be considered science 0.91
be in science possible 0.90
be called science of sciences 0.89
be science of sciences 0.89
science of sciences 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(philosophy, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be important in science)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(philosophy, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, is science)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(philosophy, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be considered science)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(philosophy, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(mathematics, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(mathematics, be important in science)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(philosophy, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(mathematics, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(mathematics, is science)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(philosophy, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(mathematics, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(mathematics, be considered science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(philosophy, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(philosophy, be important in science)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(philosophy, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(philosophy, is science)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(philosophy, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(philosophy, be called science)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(philosophy, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(philosophy, is science)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(philosophy, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(philosophy, be different from science)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(philosophy, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(philosophy, be considered science)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(philosophy, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(philosophy, is science)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(philosophy, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(philosophy, be called science)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(philosophy, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(philosophy, be related to science)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(philosophy, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(philosophy, be called science)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(philosophy, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(philosophy, be different from science)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(philosophy, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(philosophy, be considered science)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(philosophy, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(philosophy, be different from science)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(philosophy, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(philosophy, be considered science)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(philosophy, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(philosophy, is science)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(philosophy, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(philosophy, be related to science)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(philosophy, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(philosophy, be called science)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(philosophy, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(philosophy, be related to science)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(philosophy, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(philosophy, be different from science)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(philosophy, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(philosophy, be considered science)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(philosophy, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(philosophy, be related to science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(philosophy, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(philosophy, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(philosophy, be important in science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(philosophy, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(philosophy, be important in science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(philosophy, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(mathematics, is science)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(philosophy, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(mathematics, be considered science)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(philosophy, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(mathematics, be important in science)