philosophy: be related to science

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents discipline
Weight: 0.67
, theme
Weight: 0.66
, approach
Weight: 0.66
, program
Weight: 0.65
Siblings buddhism
Weight: 0.66
, libertarianism
Weight: 0.65
, experience
Weight: 0.64
, materialism
Weight: 0.64
, mathematics
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related to science 1.00
is science 0.92
be important in science 0.92
be called science 0.90
be considered science 0.90
be different from science 0.89
be related to other sciences 0.89
be related to sciences 0.88
be in science possible 0.88
be science of sciences 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(philosophy, be related to science)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be important in science)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(philosophy, be related to science)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, is science)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(philosophy, be related to science)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be considered science)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(philosophy, be related to science)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(mathematics, is science)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(mathematics, is science)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(philosophy, be related to science)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(mathematics, be important in science)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(mathematics, be important in science)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(philosophy, be related to science)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(mathematics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(mathematics, be considered science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(philosophy, be related to science)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(philosophy, be related to science)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(philosophy, be related to science)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(philosophy, is science)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(philosophy, be related to science)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(philosophy, is science)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(philosophy, be related to science)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(philosophy, be called science)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(philosophy, be related to science)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(philosophy, be important in science)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(philosophy, be related to science)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(philosophy, be considered science)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(philosophy, be related to science)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(philosophy, be different from science)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(philosophy, be related to science)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(philosophy, be called science)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(philosophy, be related to science)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(philosophy, is science)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(philosophy, be related to science)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(philosophy, be related to other sciences)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(philosophy, be related to science)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(philosophy, be considered science)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(philosophy, be related to science)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(philosophy, be called science)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(philosophy, be related to science)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(philosophy, be different from science)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(philosophy, be related to science)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(philosophy, be considered science)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(philosophy, be related to science)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(philosophy, be different from science)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(philosophy, be related to science)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(philosophy, be important in science)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(philosophy, be related to science)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(philosophy, be important in science)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(philosophy, be related to science)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(philosophy, be related to other sciences)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(philosophy, be related to science)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(philosophy, be related to other sciences)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(philosophy, be related to science)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(philosophy, be important in science)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(philosophy, be related to science)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(philosophy, is science)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(philosophy, be related to science)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(philosophy, be related to other sciences)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(philosophy, be related to science)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(philosophy, be called science)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(philosophy, be related to science)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(philosophy, be considered science)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(philosophy, be related to science)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(philosophy, be different from science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(philosophy, be related to science)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(philosophy, be related to science)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(philosophy, be related to science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(philosophy, be related to science)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(philosophy, be related to science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(philosophy, be related to science)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(mathematics, is science)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(philosophy, be related to science)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(mathematics, be considered science)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(philosophy, be related to science)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(mathematics, be important in science)