mathematics: is science

Related concepts

Parents	science Weight: 0.73 , computer science Weight: 0.72 , math Weight: 0.64 , department Weight: 0.64 , philosophy Weight: 0.64
Siblings	physics Weight: 0.37 , quantum physics Weight: 0.37 , biology Weight: 0.37 , arithmetic Weight: 0.37 , metaphysics Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property	Similarity
is science	1.00
be important to science	0.96
be important in science	0.95
be considered science	0.93
is natural science	0.90
be important to engineering science	0.90
be important to science engineering	0.90
field of science	0.90
be language of science	0.89
language of science	0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.65

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.48

Plausible(philosophy, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Typical(mathematics, is science)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(math, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Typical(mathematics, is science)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.18

Plausible(computer science, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Typical(mathematics, is science)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(philosophy, be important in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Typical(mathematics, is science)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(math, be important to science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Typical(mathematics, is science)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.53

Plausible(math, be important in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Typical(mathematics, is science)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.50

Plausible(philosophy, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Typical(mathematics, is science)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.23

Plausible(computer science, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Typical(mathematics, is science)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(math, be language of science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Typical(mathematics, is science)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(mathematics, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Plausible(computer science, is science)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(mathematics, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Plausible(computer science, be considered science)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(mathematics, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Plausible(math, is science)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(mathematics, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Plausible(math, be language of science)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(mathematics, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Plausible(philosophy, is science)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(mathematics, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Plausible(philosophy, be considered science)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(mathematics, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Plausible(math, be important in science)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(mathematics, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Plausible(math, be important to science)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(mathematics, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(philosophy, be important in science)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.11

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(mathematics, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(philosophy, be important in science)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(mathematics, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(philosophy, be considered science)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(mathematics, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(philosophy, is science)

0.02

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(mathematics, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(computer science, be considered science)

0.02

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(mathematics, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(math, be important to science)

0.01

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.02
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(mathematics, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(computer science, is science)

0.01

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.02
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(mathematics, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(math, is science)

0.01

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.02
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(mathematics, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(math, be important in science)

0.01

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.02
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(mathematics, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Remarkable(math, be language of science)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(mathematics, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(physics, be considered science)

0.00

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.04
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(mathematics, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(biology, be considered science)

0.00

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(mathematics, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(biology, is science)

0.00

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(mathematics, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(physics, is science)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.48

Plausible(philosophy, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

Remarkable(mathematics, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Plausible(mathematics, is science)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(math, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

Remarkable(mathematics, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Plausible(mathematics, is science)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.18

Plausible(computer science, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

Remarkable(mathematics, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Plausible(mathematics, is science)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(math, be important to science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

Remarkable(mathematics, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Plausible(mathematics, is science)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(philosophy, be important in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

Remarkable(mathematics, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Plausible(mathematics, is science)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.53

Plausible(math, be important in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

Remarkable(mathematics, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Plausible(mathematics, is science)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.50

Plausible(philosophy, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

Remarkable(mathematics, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Plausible(mathematics, is science)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.23

Plausible(computer science, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

Remarkable(mathematics, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Plausible(mathematics, is science)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(math, be language of science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

Remarkable(mathematics, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Plausible(mathematics, is science)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(mathematics, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

Remarkable(physics, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Plausible(physics, is science)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(mathematics, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

Remarkable(biology, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Plausible(biology, is science)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(mathematics, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

Remarkable(biology, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Plausible(biology, be considered science)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(mathematics, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

Remarkable(physics, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Plausible(physics, be considered science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(mathematics, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Salient(mathematics, is science)

Similarity expansion

0.80

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.99

Remarkable(mathematics, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be important to science)

0.80

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.99

Remarkable(mathematics, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be important in science)

0.78

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.99

Remarkable(mathematics, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be considered science)

0.78

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.03

Typical(mathematics, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Typical(mathematics, be considered science)

0.76

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.99

Remarkable(mathematics, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be important to science engineering)

0.76

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.99

Remarkable(mathematics, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be important to engineering science)

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.03

Typical(mathematics, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Typical(mathematics, be language of science)

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.03

Typical(mathematics, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Typical(mathematics, language of science)

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.99

Remarkable(mathematics, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be language of science)

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.99

Remarkable(mathematics, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(mathematics, language of science)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(mathematics, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Plausible(mathematics, be considered science)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(mathematics, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Plausible(mathematics, be language of science)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(mathematics, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Plausible(mathematics, language of science)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.53

Salient(mathematics, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Salient(mathematics, be considered science)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.53

Salient(mathematics, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Salient(mathematics, be language of science)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.53

Salient(mathematics, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Salient(mathematics, language of science)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.03

Typical(mathematics, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Typical(mathematics, be important in science)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.03

Typical(mathematics, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Typical(mathematics, be important to science)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.53

Salient(mathematics, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Salient(mathematics, be important to science)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.53

Salient(mathematics, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Salient(mathematics, be important in science)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(mathematics, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Plausible(mathematics, be important in science)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(mathematics, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Plausible(mathematics, be important to science)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.53

Salient(mathematics, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Salient(mathematics, be important to engineering science)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.53

Salient(mathematics, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Salient(mathematics, be important to science engineering)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(mathematics, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Plausible(mathematics, be important to engineering science)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.03

Typical(mathematics, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Typical(mathematics, be important to engineering science)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(mathematics, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Plausible(mathematics, be important to science engineering)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.03

Typical(mathematics, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(mathematics, be important to science engineering)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.53

Salient(mathematics, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Typical(mathematics, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(mathematics, is science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(mathematics, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Typical(mathematics, is science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.51

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(mathematics, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Typical(computer science, is science)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(mathematics, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Typical(computer science, be considered science)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(mathematics, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Typical(math, is science)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(mathematics, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(math, be language of science)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(mathematics, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Typical(math, be important in science)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(mathematics, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Typical(philosophy, is science)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(mathematics, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(math, be important to science)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(mathematics, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(philosophy, be considered science)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(mathematics, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(philosophy, be important in science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(mathematics, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(biology, is science)

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(mathematics, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Typical(physics, is science)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(mathematics, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Typical(biology, be considered science)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(mathematics, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Typical(physics, be considered science)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.03

Typical(mathematics, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Typical(computer science, is science)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.03

Typical(mathematics, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Typical(computer science, be considered science)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.03

Typical(mathematics, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Typical(math, is science)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.03

Typical(mathematics, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(math, be language of science)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.03

Typical(mathematics, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Typical(philosophy, is science)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.03

Typical(mathematics, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Typical(math, be important in science)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.03

Typical(mathematics, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(math, be important to science)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.03

Typical(mathematics, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(philosophy, be considered science)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.03

Typical(mathematics, is science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(philosophy, be important in science)