math: is science

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents program
Weight: 0.61
, fundamental
Weight: 0.61
, elementary school
Weight: 0.60
, topic
Weight: 0.60
, core
Weight: 0.59
Siblings calculus
Weight: 0.61
, boolean algebra
Weight: 0.34
, kindergarten
Weight: 0.34
, science
Weight: 0.34
, science fiction
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is science 1.00
be in science 0.99
be important to science 0.96
be important in science 0.95
be used in science 0.95
be related to science 0.92
be involved in science 0.90
be useful in science 0.89
be language of science 0.89
be used in computer science 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(math, is science)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(calculus, be useful in science)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.01
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(math, is science)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(science, be related to science)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(math, is science)
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(science, be related to science)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(science, be related to science)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(math, is science)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(calculus, be useful in science)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(calculus, be useful in science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(math, is science)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(math, is science)

Similarity expansion

0.84
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(math, is science)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(math, be in science)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(math, is science)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(math, be important to science)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(math, is science)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(math, be important in science)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(math, is science)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(math, be used in science)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(math, is science)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(math, be related to science)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(math, is science)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(math, be used in science)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(math, is science)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(math, be in science)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(math, is science)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(math, be involved in science)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(math, is science)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(math, be useful in science)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(math, is science)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(math, be language of science)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(math, is science)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(math, be useful in science)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(math, is science)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(math, be involved in science)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(math, is science)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(math, be language of science)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(math, is science)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(math, be related to science)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(math, is science)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(math, be used in science)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(math, is science)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(math, be in science)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(math, is science)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(math, be in science)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(math, is science)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(math, be used in science)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(math, is science)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(math, be important in science)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(math, is science)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(math, be related to science)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(math, is science)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(math, be important in science)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(math, is science)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(math, be important to science)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(math, is science)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(math, be useful in science)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(math, is science)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(math, be language of science)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(math, is science)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(math, be language of science)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(math, is science)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(math, be involved in science)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(math, is science)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(math, be involved in science)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(math, is science)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(math, be useful in science)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(math, is science)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(math, be related to science)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(math, is science)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(math, be important in science)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(math, is science)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(math, be important to science)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(math, is science)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(math, be important to science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(math, is science)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(math, is science)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(math, is science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(math, is science)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(math, is science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(math, is science)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(science, be related to science)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(math, is science)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(calculus, be useful in science)