mathematics: language of science

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents science
Weight: 0.73
, computer science
Weight: 0.72
, math
Weight: 0.64
, department
Weight: 0.64
, philosophy
Weight: 0.64
Siblings physics
Weight: 0.37
, quantum physics
Weight: 0.37
, biology
Weight: 0.37
, arithmetic
Weight: 0.37
, metaphysics
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
language of science 1.00
be language of science 1.00
be called language of science 0.98
be considered language of science 0.96
be language of physics 0.89
is science 0.89
language of physics 0.89
be considered language of physics 0.88
be important to science 0.85
be important in science 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(math, be language of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(mathematics, language of science)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(philosophy, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(mathematics, language of science)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(math, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(mathematics, language of science)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(computer science, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(mathematics, language of science)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(math, be important to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(mathematics, language of science)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(philosophy, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(mathematics, language of science)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(math, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(mathematics, language of science)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(mathematics, language of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(computer science, is science)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(mathematics, language of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(math, be language of science)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(mathematics, language of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(math, is science)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(mathematics, language of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(philosophy, is science)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(mathematics, language of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(math, be important in science)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(mathematics, language of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(math, be important to science)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(mathematics, language of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(philosophy, be important in science)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, language of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(philosophy, be important in science)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, language of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(philosophy, is science)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.02
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, language of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(math, be important to science)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.02
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, language of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(computer science, is science)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.02
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, language of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(math, is science)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.01
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, language of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(math, be important in science)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.01
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, language of science) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(math, be language of science)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.02
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, language of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(biology, is science)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.02
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, language of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(physics, is science)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(math, be language of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(mathematics, language of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(mathematics, language of science)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(philosophy, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(mathematics, language of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(mathematics, language of science)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(math, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(mathematics, language of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(mathematics, language of science)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(computer science, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(mathematics, language of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(mathematics, language of science)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(math, be important to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(mathematics, language of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(mathematics, language of science)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(philosophy, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(mathematics, language of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(mathematics, language of science)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(math, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(mathematics, language of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(mathematics, language of science)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(mathematics, language of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(physics, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(physics, is science)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(mathematics, language of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(biology, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(biology, is science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(mathematics, language of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(mathematics, language of science)

Similarity expansion

0.84
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(mathematics, language of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be language of science)
0.84
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(mathematics, language of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(mathematics, be language of science)
0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(mathematics, language of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be called language of science)
0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(mathematics, language of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(mathematics, be called language of science)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(mathematics, language of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(mathematics, be language of physics)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(mathematics, language of science) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be language of physics)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(mathematics, language of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, is science)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(mathematics, language of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(mathematics, is science)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(mathematics, language of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(mathematics, be language of science)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(mathematics, language of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be important to science)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(mathematics, language of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(mathematics, be called language of science)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(mathematics, language of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be important in science)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(mathematics, language of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(mathematics, be language of physics)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(mathematics, language of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(mathematics, be language of science)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(mathematics, language of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(mathematics, be called language of science)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(mathematics, language of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(mathematics, is science)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(mathematics, language of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(mathematics, be language of physics)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(mathematics, language of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(mathematics, is science)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(mathematics, language of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(mathematics, be important in science)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(mathematics, language of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(mathematics, be important to science)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(mathematics, language of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(mathematics, be important to science)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(mathematics, language of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(mathematics, be important in science)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(mathematics, language of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(mathematics, be important in science)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(mathematics, language of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(mathematics, be important to science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(mathematics, language of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(mathematics, language of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, language of science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(mathematics, language of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(mathematics, language of science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, language of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(math, be language of science)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, language of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(computer science, is science)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, language of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(math, is science)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, language of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(math, be important in science)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, language of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(philosophy, is science)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, language of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(math, be important to science)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, language of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(philosophy, be important in science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, language of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(biology, is science)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, language of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(physics, is science)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(mathematics, language of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(math, be language of science)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(mathematics, language of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(computer science, is science)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(mathematics, language of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(math, is science)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(mathematics, language of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(math, be important in science)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(mathematics, language of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(philosophy, is science)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(mathematics, language of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(math, be important to science)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(mathematics, language of science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(philosophy, be important in science)