astronomy: is fascinating

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents field
Weight: 0.63
, art
Weight: 0.62
, study
Weight: 0.62
, science
Weight: 0.61
, subject
Weight: 0.60
Siblings computer science
Weight: 0.36
, meteorology
Weight: 0.35
, mathematics
Weight: 0.35
, physics
Weight: 0.35
, quantum physics
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is fascinating 1.00
is interesting 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(art, is interesting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(astronomy, is fascinating)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(astronomy, is fascinating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(art, is interesting)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, is fascinating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(art, is interesting)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, is fascinating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(computer science, is fascinating)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, is fascinating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(computer science, is interesting)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, is fascinating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(meteorology, is interesting)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(art, is interesting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(astronomy, is fascinating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(astronomy, is fascinating)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(astronomy, is fascinating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(computer science, is fascinating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(computer science, is fascinating)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(astronomy, is fascinating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(meteorology, is interesting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(meteorology, is interesting)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(astronomy, is fascinating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(computer science, is interesting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(computer science, is interesting)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(astronomy, is fascinating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(astronomy, is fascinating)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(astronomy, is fascinating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(astronomy, is interesting)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(astronomy, is fascinating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(astronomy, is interesting)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(astronomy, is fascinating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(astronomy, is interesting)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(astronomy, is fascinating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, is interesting)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(astronomy, is fascinating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(astronomy, is fascinating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, is fascinating)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(astronomy, is fascinating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(astronomy, is fascinating)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, is fascinating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(art, is interesting)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, is fascinating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(meteorology, is interesting)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, is fascinating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(computer science, is fascinating)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, is fascinating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(computer science, is interesting)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(astronomy, is fascinating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(art, is interesting)